首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies >‘They Called Them Communists Then … What D'You Call ‘Em Now? … Insurgents?’. Narratives of British Military Expatriates in the Context of the New Imperialism
【24h】

‘They Called Them Communists Then … What D'You Call ‘Em Now? … Insurgents?’. Narratives of British Military Expatriates in the Context of the New Imperialism

机译:“他们然后称他们为共产党员”-D'You称其为“ Em Now?”(叛乱分子)。新帝国主义语境下的英国军人叙事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper addresses the question of the extent to which the colonial past provides material for contemporary actors' understanding of difference. The research from which the paper is drawn involved interview and ethnographic work in three largely white working-class estates in an English provincial city. For this paper we focus on ten life-history interviews with older participants who had spent some time abroad in the British military. Our analysis adopts a postcolonial framework because research participants' current constructions of an amorphous ‘Other’ (labelled variously as black people, immigrants, foreigners, asylum-seekers or Muslims) reveal strong continuities with discourses deployed by the same individuals to narrate their past experiences of living and working as either military expatriates or spouses during British colonial rule. Theoretically, the paper engages with the work of Frantz Fanon and Edward Said. In keeping with a postcolonial approach, we work against essentialised notions of identity based on ‘race’ or class. Although we establish continuity between white working-class military emigration in the past and contemporary racialised discourses, we argue that the latter are not class-specific, being as much the creations of the middle-class media and political elite.View full textDownload full textKeywordsBritish Emigration, Postcolonialism, New Imperialism, Immigration, ‘Race’Related var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691831003687741
机译:本文探讨的问题是殖民时代在多大程度上为当代演员的差异理解提供了素材。本文的研究涉及在英国一个省级城市的三个白人工人阶级阶层进行的采访和人种志研究。在本文中,我们重点介绍了十次生活史访谈,采访了在国外度过一段时间的英国军人的老年参与者。我们的分析采用了后殖民的框架,因为研究参与者当前对无定形的“其他”(其他被称为黑人,移民,外国人,寻求庇护者或穆斯林的标记)的构造显示出强烈的连续性,这些连续性由同一个人进行叙述他们过去在英国殖民统治期间作为军事外籍人士或配偶生活和工作的经历。从理论上讲,该论文与Frantz Fanon和Edward Edward的工作有关。与后殖民主义方法保持一致,我们反对基于“种族”或阶级的本质化身份观念。尽管我们建立了过去白人工人阶级军事移民与当代种族化言论之间的连续性,但我们认为后者不是特定于阶级的,而是中产阶级媒体和政治精英的创造。查看全文下载全文关键字英国移民,后殖民主义,新帝国主义,移民,“种族”相关的变量add add_id google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691831003687741

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号