首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies >Refugees' Experiences of Home Office Interviews: A Qualitative Study on the Disclosure of Sensitive Personal Information
【24h】

Refugees' Experiences of Home Office Interviews: A Qualitative Study on the Disclosure of Sensitive Personal Information

机译:难民在内政部采访中的经历:对敏感个人信息披露的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Decisions on refugee status rely heavily on judgments about how individuals present themselves and their histories. Late or non-disclosure of sensitive personal information, for example, may be assumed to be a result of fabrication by the asylum claimant. However, if incorrect, such assumptions can lead to genuine refugees in need of protection being refused asylum. A study employing semi-structured interviews with 27 refugees and asylum-seekers with traumatic histories was conducted to explore the factors involved in the disclosure of sensitive personal information during Home Office interviews in the UK. Many reported difficulties with disclosing personal details, and interviewer qualities emerged as the strongest factor in either facilitating or impeding disclosure. The interview data showed that disclosure was not just based on personal decisions and internal processes, but was also related to interpersonal, situational and contextual factors. Recommendations for improving Home Office procedures are also discussed.View full textDownload full textKeywordsRefugees, Self-Disclosure, Asylum Interviews, Trauma, UK Home OfficeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691830903368329
机译:关于难民地位的决定在很大程度上取决于对个人表现方式及其历史的判断。例如,可以认为敏感个人信息的过迟或不公开是庇护申请人捏造的结果。但是,如果这种假设不正确,则可能导致需要保护的真正难民被庇护。进行了一项研究,该研究采用半结构化访谈方式,对27名具有创伤史的难民和寻求庇护者进行了采访,以探讨英国内政部采访期间泄露敏感个人信息的因素。许多人报告说难以公开个人详细信息,而访调员的素质已成为促进或阻碍披露的最重要因素。访谈数据表明,披露不仅基于个人决策和内部流程,而且还与人际关系,情境和情境因素有关。还讨论了有关改进内​​政部程序的建议。 technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691830903368329

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号