首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies >Do People Who Like Diversity Practice Diversity in Neighbourhood Life? Neighbourhood Use and the Social Networks of ‘Diversity-Seekers’ in a Mixed Neighbourhood in the Netherlands
【24h】

Do People Who Like Diversity Practice Diversity in Neighbourhood Life? Neighbourhood Use and the Social Networks of ‘Diversity-Seekers’ in a Mixed Neighbourhood in the Netherlands

机译:喜欢多样性的人会在邻里生活中实践多样性吗?荷兰的混合社区中的社区使用和“多元化寻求者”的社交网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Urban policies in various countries aim at integrating minorities into mainstream society through combating residential segregation. One strategy is to change the housing stock. Assuming that the middle classes leave certain neighbourhoods because they lack suitable dwellings, building more expensive dwellings is an important policy trajectory in the Netherlands. However, living in the proximity of other income groups is in itself insufficient to overcome racial, ethnic and class divides in social networks. The usual policy indicator for defining ‘middle class’, e.g. income, is not a very good predictor for the diversity of networks of people living in mixed neighbourhoods. What, then, is? The first step is to ask what distinguishes people who prefer diverse neighbourhoods. Are people who are attracted by the diversity of an area different from others? Next, we question whether people who like diversity have more diversity in their networks or contribute in other ways to a more integrated neighbourhood through their use of it. We use social network data collected in a mixed inner-city neighbourhood in Rotterdam to explore this. We argue that attracting people to an area because of its diversity may contribute to the economic viability of local businesses and possibly to the nature of interactions in public space. However, we can not empirically substantiate that a preference for a diverse neighbourhood translates into distinct practices or social networks that enhance the integration of ethnic minorities into mainstream society.View full textDownload full textKeywordsCohesion, Ethnic Diversity, Integration, Neighbourhood, Social Networks, RotterdamRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691830903387436
机译:各个国家/地区的城市政策旨在通过反对居住隔离,将少数民族纳入主流社会。一种策略是改变住房存量。假设中产阶级由于缺乏合适的住房而离开某些社区,那么建造更昂贵的住房是荷兰的重要政策轨迹。但是,生活在其他收入群体附近并不足以克服社会网络中的种族,种族和阶级鸿沟。用于定义“中产阶级”的常用政策指标,例如收入并不能很好地预测混合社区居民网络的多样性。那是什么?第一步是要问那些喜欢不同社区的人有什么区别。被一个地区的多样性所吸引的人与众不同吗?接下来,我们质疑喜欢多样性的人的网络是否具有更多的多样性,还是通过使用它以其他方式为更加融合的社区做出了贡献。我们使用在鹿特丹的一个混合城市内社区中收集的社交网络数据来探索这一点。我们认为,由于地区的多样性而吸引人们到该地区可能有助于当地企业的经济生存能力,并可能有助于公共空间中互动的性质。但是,我们无法凭经验证明对多元化邻里的偏爱会转化为独特的做法或社交网络,从而增强了少数族裔融入主流社会的能力。 addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691830903387436

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号