首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies >Trade-Offs between Equality and Difference: Immigrant Integration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in Cross-National Perspective
【24h】

Trade-Offs between Equality and Difference: Immigrant Integration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in Cross-National Perspective

机译:平等与差异之间的取舍:跨国视角下的移民融合,多元文化和福利国家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper investigates how integration policies and welfare-state regimes have affected the socio-economic integration of immigrants, focusing on eight European countries: Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Austria and Belgium. It presents comparative data on integration policies and welfare-state regimes. The expectations derived from this comparative policy analysis are tested with cross-national data on integration outcomes regarding labour market participation, spatial segregation and incarceration. The results suggest that multicultural policies—which grant immigrants easy access to equal rights and do not provide strong incentives for host-country language acquisition and interethnic contacts—when combined with a generous welfare state, have produced low levels of labour market participation, high levels of segregation and a strong overrepresentation of immigrants among those convicted for criminal behaviour. Sweden, Belgium and the Netherlands, which have combined multicultural policies with a strong welfare state, display relatively poor integration outcomes. Countries that either had more restrictive or assimilationist integration policies (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France) or a relatively lean welfare state (the United Kingdom) have achieved better integration results. These differences are highly consistent across the three domains of integration that are examined, with the exception of segregation rates in the United Kingdom.View full textDownload full textKeywordsMulticulturalism, Citizenship Rights, Welfare State, Socio-Economic Integration, SegregationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691830903250881
机译:本文主要针对八个欧洲国家:德国,法国,英国,荷兰,瑞士,瑞典,奥地利和比利时,研究融合政策和福利国家制度如何影响移民的社会经济融合。它提供了有关融合政策和福利国家制度的比较数据。这项比较政策分析得出的期望值将通过有关劳动力市场参与,空间隔离和监禁的一体化成果的跨国数据进行检验。结果表明,多元文化政策(赋予移民容易获得平等权利的机会,并没有为东道国语言习得和种族间接触提供强有力的激励措施),当与慷慨的福利国家结合使用时,劳动力市场参与程度较低,在因犯罪行为被定罪的移民中,种族隔离程度高,移民人数过多。瑞典,比利时和荷兰将多元文化政策与强大的福利国家相结合,显示出相对较差的融合结果。拥有更多限制性或同化融合政策(德国,奥地利,瑞士,法国)或相对贫乏的福利国家(英国)的国家取得了更好的融合结果。这些差异在所考察的三个整合领域中高度一致,但英国的隔离率除外。查看全文下载全文关键词多元文化,公民权,福利国家,社会经济一体化,隔离相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand: “泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691830903250881

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号