Spatially differentiated strategies for reducing nitrate loads from agriculture in two Danish catchments

摘要

AbstractNutrient loss from agriculture is the largest source of diffuse water pollution in Denmark. To reduce nutrient loads a number of solutions have been implemented, but this has been insufficient to achieve the environmental objectives without unacceptable repercussions for agricultural production. This has substantiated the need to develop a new approach to achieve nitrogen (N) load reduction to the aquatic environments with lower costs to farmers. The new approach imply targeting N leaching mitigation to those parts of the landscape which contribute most to the N-loadings. This would involve either reducing the source loading or enhancing the natural reduction (denitrification) of N after it is leached from the root zone of agricultural crops. In this study, a new method of spatially differentiated analysis for two Danish catchments (Odense and Norsminde) was conducted that reach across the individual farms to achieve selected N-load reduction targets. It includes application of cover crops within current crop rotations, set-a-side application on high N-load areas, and changes in agricultural management based on maps of N-reduction available for two different spatial scales, considering soil type and farm boundaries as spatial constraints. In summary, the results revealed that considering spatial constraints for changes in agricultural management will affect the effectiveness of N-load reduction, and the highest N-load reduction was achieved where less constraints were considered. The results also showed that the range of variation in land use, soil types, and N-reduction potential influence the reduction of N-loadings that can originate from critical source areas. The greater the spatial variation the greater the potential for N load reduction through targeting of measures. Therefore, the effectiveness of spatially differentiated measures in term of set-a-side area in Odense catchment were relatively greater compared to Norsminde catchment. The results also showed that using a fine spatial N-reduction map provides greater potential for N load reductions compared to using sub-catchment scale N-reduction maps.Highlights•Spatial management of reducing N-load exploit variation in groundwater reduction.•The reduction of N-load is enhanced by spatial variation in groundwater reduction.•Including spatial constraints reduced potential for reducing N-load.•Effectiveness of spatial targeting needs fine spatial resolution of N-reduction maps.