首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Did the EPA's voluntary industrial toxics program reduce emissions? A GIS analysis of distributional impacts and by-media analysis of substitution
【24h】

Did the EPA's voluntary industrial toxics program reduce emissions? A GIS analysis of distributional impacts and by-media analysis of substitution

机译:EPA的自愿性工业有毒计划是否减少了排放?地理信息系统的分布影响分析和替代媒介分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Voluntary programs in which manufacturing plants pledge to reduce their emissions beyond the legal requirement have been promoted as a low-cost way to achieve health and environmental protection. The EPA's Industrial Toxics program is evaluated using an author-assembled GIS-database of manufacturing plants in the 48 contiguous states, controlling for mandated reductions in ozone depleting chemicals and changes in reporting of emissions. I find that, controlling for participants' self-selection into the program, relative to non-participants, participants do not reduce their health-indexed emissions of target chemicals in several key industries. Where reductions are detected in selected industries, participants' increased off-site transfers to recyclers give reasons to question whether this program truly reduced emissions. Moreover, the program did not reduce emissions in less politically active communities.
机译:制造厂承诺减少其排放量超过法律要求的自愿性计划已被推广为实现健康和环境保护的一种低成本方式。 EPA的“工业毒理学”计划是使用作者组装的GIS数据库在48个连续州的工厂进行评估的,以控制强制性的臭氧消耗化学物质减少和排放报告的变化。我发现,控制参与者的自我选择,相对于非参与者,参与者没有减少他们在几个关键行业中以健康指数为目标的目标化学品的排放量。在选定行业中发现减少的地方,参与者增加了向回收商的异地转移,这使人们有理由怀疑该计划是否真正减少了排放。此外,该计划并未减少政治活动较少的社区的排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号