首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Non-renewable resource prices: Deterministic or stochastic trends?
【24h】

Non-renewable resource prices: Deterministic or stochastic trends?

机译:不可再生资源价格:确定性趋势还是随机性趋势?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we examine temporal properties of 11 natural resource real price series from 1870 to 1990. Recent studies by Ahrens and Sharma [Trends in natural resource commodity prices: deterministic or stochastic? J. Environ. Econom. Manage. 33(1997)59-74], Berck and Roberts [Natural resource prices: will they ever turn up? J. Environ. Econom. Manage. 31(1996)65-78], and Slade [Grade selection under uncertainty: least cost last and other anomalies, J. Environ. Econom. Manage. 15(1988)189-205], among others, find that many non-renewable resource prices have a stochastic trend. We revisit this issue by employing a Lagrangian multiplier unit root test that allows for two endogenously determined structural breaks with and without a quadratic trend. Contrary to previous research, we find evidence against the unit root hypothesis for all price series. Our findings support characterizing natural resource prices as stationary around deterministic trends with structural breaks. We additionally show that both pre-testing for unit roots with breaks and allowing for breaks in the forecast model can improve forecast accuracy. Overall, the results in this paper are important in both a positive and normative sense; without an appropriate understanding of the dynamics of a time series, empirical verification of theories, forecasting, and proper inference are potentially fruitless.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了1870年至1990年的11种自然资源实际价格序列的时间特性。Ahrens和Sharma的最新研究[自然资源商品价格趋势:确定性还是随机性? J.环境。经济。管理。 33(1997)59-74],伯克和罗伯茨[自然资源价格:他们会出现吗? J.环境。经济。管理。 31(1996)65-78]和斯拉德[不确定性下的等级选择:最小成本倒数和其他异常,J.Environ。经济。管理。 15(1988)189-205]等人发现许多不可再生资源价格具有随机趋势。我们通过使用拉格朗日乘数单位根检验来重新审视此问题,该检验允许两个内生确定的结构断裂(有无二次趋势)。与先前的研究相反,我们发现了针对所有价格序列的单位根假设的证据。我们的发现支持将自然资源价格定性为围绕结构性突破的确定性趋势。我们还显示,对带有断裂的单位根进行预测试并在预测模型中允许断裂都可以提高预测准确性。总体而言,本文的结果在积极意义和规范意义上都是重要的。如果对时间序列的动力学没有适当的了解,则对理论,预测和正确推断的经验验证可能无济于事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号