首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environment informatics >Ceramic Water Filters: A Point-of-Use Water Treatment Technology to Remove Bacteria from Drinking Water in Longhai City, Fujian Province, China
【24h】

Ceramic Water Filters: A Point-of-Use Water Treatment Technology to Remove Bacteria from Drinking Water in Longhai City, Fujian Province, China

机译:陶瓷滤水器:中国福建省龙海市的一种使用点水处理技术,用于去除饮用水中的细菌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While provision of safe drinking water is considered a basic human right, there are major challenges in the developing world for its provision. The ability to deliver safe water using a cost-appropriate technology is a major aspect of the problem. One of the technologies that has the potential to contribute significantly is the ceramic water filter (CWF); however, as shown herein, there are significant differences between performance of CWFs in the laboratory and in field applications. The CWFs employed in this study (field and laboratory) have a pore fraction of 21.0 - 22.4% and an average maximum pore diameter of 5.7 - 15.2 mu m. Field studies were completed in Longhai City, China, a rural community in southeastern China with red earth, high precipitation and intensive human/domestic activities. During field trials, CWFs demonstrated an average removal efficiency of 94.7%, with values ranging from 75-100%, whereas in laboratory studies, average removal efficiency was determined to be 99.5%, with values ranging from 97.7-99.9%. Differences between the lab and field removal efficiencies are attributed to contamination of the filter element and receptacle by villagers during field utilization and cleaning. Effective technology transfer to the end-user is required to achieve the bacterial removal efficiency attainable by the technology itself.
机译:尽管提供安全饮用水被视为一项基本人权,但在发展中国家,提供安全饮用水仍面临重大挑战。问题的主要方面是使用适合成本的技术提供安全水的能力。陶瓷水过滤器(CWF)是具有巨大潜力的一项技术。但是,如此处所示,在实验室和现场应用中,CWF的性能之间存在显着差异。在这项研究中(现场和实验室)使用的CWF的孔隙率为21.0-22.4%,平均最大孔径为5.7-15.2微米。在中国东南部的农村社区龙海市完成了实地研究,该社区地带红土,高降水量和密集的人类/家庭活动。在田间试验中,CWF的平均去除效率为94.7%,范围为75-100%,而在实验室研究中,平均去除效率为99.5%,范围为97.7-99.9%。实验室效率与现场去除效率之间的差异是由于村民在现场使用和清洁过程中对滤芯和容器的污染所致。需要有效的技术转让给最终用户,以实现该技术本身可达到的细菌去除效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号