...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environment & Development >Making a Difference? Accounting for Nongovernmental Organizations in the Comanagement of Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia
【24h】

Making a Difference? Accounting for Nongovernmental Organizations in the Comanagement of Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia

机译:有所作为?在印度尼西亚联邦国家公园协调中的非政府组织核算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are often found playing a critical role in facilitating aspects of protected area comanagement in the Global South. In Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia, three NGOs facilitated comanagement between 1998 and 2006. This article assesses the extent to which the comanagement strategies and approaches of these NGOs were aligned with their policy aims. The Nature Conservancy (TNC) focused on biodiversity conservation, whereas Yayasan Tanah Merdeka (YTM) and Yayasan Jambata (YJ) supported indigenous rights to resource extraction. Their strategies appeared to be consistent with their aims. Both YTM and YJ concentrated their efforts in indigenous communities with fewer customary rights and larger proportions of their territories located inside the park. By contrast, TNC targeted a much larger number of communities with larger territories and forest areas, which were vulnerable to the spread of cocoa cultivation. The evidence for an alignment between aims and approaches is mixed. The NGOs' approaches were influenced by local actors, particularly indigenous leaders and institutions, who used comanagement as a means of strengthening claims to customary territories. Communities obtained extraction rights, and many negotiated the right to exclude outsiders from their territories, which may have helped contain the spread of cocoa cultivation.
机译:非政府组织(非政府组织)往往发现在促进全球南方的保护区复合的方面促进了关键作用。 1998年至2006年期间,印度尼西亚拉默尔德国家公园的三个非政府组织促进了共同组成的三个非政府组织。本条评估这些非政府组织的复合战略和方法与他们的政策目标一致的程度。自然保护(TNC)专注于生物多样性保护,而Yayasan Tanah Merdeka(YTM)和Yayasan Jambata(YJ)支持了资源提取的土着权利。他们的策略似乎与他们的目标保持一致。 YTM和YJ都集中了他们在土着社区的努力,习惯性较少,其领土的比例更大,位于公园内。相比之下,TNC针对具有更大领土和森林地区的大量社区,易受可可栽培的蔓延。对目标和方法之间的一致性的证据是混合。非政府组织的方法受到当地行动者,特别是土着领导人和机构的影响,他们使用共同作为加强习惯领土的索赔手段。社区获得了提取权,许多人谈判允许从他们的领土中排除外国人的权利,这可能有助于遏制可可培养的传播。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号