...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environment & Development >Biotech Firms, Biotech Politics: Negotiating GMOs in India
【24h】

Biotech Firms, Biotech Politics: Negotiating GMOs in India

机译:生物技术公司,生物技术政治:在印度谈判转基因生物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article identifies and explains the ways in which firms involved in the debate about the role of biotechnology in Indian agriculture have sought to advance their interests. It argues that the public positions of larger biotech and agro-chemical companies, seed enterprises, and newer start-up firms and the associations to which they belong relate to the differences in their underlying corporate strategies. The extent to which these firms are involved in primary research, export their products, or require protection for their products helps to determine their political affiliations to the leading industry bodies that are active on biotechnology issues. In turn, each of these associations has been shown to have distinct patterns of interaction with particular government agencies involved in the regulation of biotechnology products, as well as differing degrees of contact with global industry coalitions. Through a combination of material influences, in most cases high levels of institutional access, and in a context in which claims about the benefits of biotechnology are echoed and repeated in influential media, industry has played an important role in the evolving regulatory regime. These forms of leverage apply to some firms more than others and smaller actors in the vast seed sector in India are barely involved directly in the current debate about India's "gene revolution." Currently, the policy agenda in Delhi appears to be far more influenced by a fairly close-knit policy network of biotech entrepreneurs from larger multinationals and successful start-up firms with good national and global connections.
机译:本文确定并解释了参与有关生物技术在印度农业中的作用的辩论的公司试图提高其利益的方式。它认为,较大的生物技术和农用化学公司,种子企业和较新的初创公司以及它们所属的协会的公众地位与其基本公司战略的差异有关。这些公司参与基础研究,出口产品或要求对其产品进行保护的程度有助于确定其与活跃于生物技术问题的领先行业机构的政治隶属关系。反过来,这些协会中的每一个都显示出与参与生物技术产品监管的特定政府机构有不同的互动模式,并且与全球行业联盟的接触程度也不同。通过物质影响的结合,在大多数情况下,高水平的机构准入以及在具有影响力的媒体中对生物技术的益处的主张得到了回应和重复的背景下,工业在不断发展的监管体制中发挥了重要作用。与其他公司相比,这些形式的杠杆对某些公司的影响更大,印度庞大的种子行业中较小的参与者几乎没有直接参与当前有关印度“基因革命”的辩论。目前,德里的政策议程似乎受到来自大型跨国公司和成功的,具有良好国家和全球关系的初创公司的紧密联系的生物技术企业家政策网络的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号