...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Psychology >Enforcing cooperation in public goods games: Is one punisher enough?
【24h】

Enforcing cooperation in public goods games: Is one punisher enough?

机译:在公益游戏中加强合作:一个惩罚者足够吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We experimentally investigate a finitely repeated public goods game setting where, in each round, access to sanctioning power is exclusively awarded to one single player per group. We show that our central Top Contributors as Punishers' institution - a mechanism by which a player needs to be the highest contributor in her group in order to earn the right to sanction others - is extremely effective in raising cooperation and welfare due to turnover in the top contributor role and to top contributors' willingness to substantially sanction others. Our findings yield implications for the design of mechanisms intended to foster cooperation in social dilemma environments. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们实验性地研究了有限重复的公益游戏环境,其中在每一轮中,授予制裁权的特权仅授予每组一个玩家。我们证明,作为惩罚者的机构,中央主要贡献者(一种机制,即玩家需要成为其团队中的最高贡献者,才能获得制裁他人的权利)在提高合作和福利方面非常有效,因为杰出贡献者的角色,以及杰出贡献者实质上认可他人的意愿。我们的发现对旨在促进社会困境环境中合作的机制的设计产生了启示。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号