首页> 外文期刊>The journal of economic perspectives >Pharmaceuticals in U. S. health care: determinants of quantity and price
【24h】

Pharmaceuticals in U. S. health care: determinants of quantity and price

机译:美国医疗保健中的药品:数量和价格的决定因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The U.S. pharmaceutical industry has again become the focus of considerable public attention and controversy, in part because of its highly visible sales growth, averaging around 12-13 percent annually over the last 15 years, along with its apparent high profitability. To understand the economics underlying the pharmaceutical industry, the traditional microeconomic distinctions between short-, medium- and long-run costs turn out to be critical, as does the distinction between accounting and economic costs. Although the long-run supply of new pharmaceuticals depends critically on research and development efforts, in the short run, R&D costs are largely sunk or fixed, while the marginal costs of manufacturing another tablet of a developed drug are typically very small. For patent-protected branded pharmaceuticals, in most cases, prices are several times greater than short-run marginal production costs, thereby making short-run gross profit margin accounting measures for pharmaceuticals among the highest in all U.S. industries. These different short- and long-run cost perspectives help one understand why the pharmaceutical industry is particularly vulnerable to public policies involving pricing. Although the conflict between static efficiency (price new drugs low, near short-run marginal cost) versus dynamic efficiency (price new drugs high, maintain incentives for innovation) is a deep and enduring one, as the costs of bringing new drugs to market have increased sharply in recent years, this tradeoff is becoming more severe. The resolution of this static versus dynamic efficiency conflict is likely the single most important issue facing the pharmaceutical industry over the next decade.
机译:美国制药业再次成为备受公众关注和争议的焦点,部分原因是其显着的销售增长,在过去15年中年平均增长率约为12-13%,同时其明显的高利润率。为了理解制药业的经济学基础,短期,中期和长期成本之间的传统微观经济差异被证明是至关重要的,会计与经济成本之间的差异也是如此。尽管新药的长期供应在很大程度上取决于研发工作,但在短期内,研发成本大部分是沉没的或固定的,而生产另一片已开发药物的边际成本通常很小。对于受专利保护的品牌药品,在大多数情况下,价格是短期边际生产成本的几倍,因此使药品的短期毛利率核算方法在所有美国行业中名列前茅。这些不同的短期和长期成本观点有助于人们理解为什么制药业特别容易受到涉及定价的公共政策的影响。尽管静态效率(价格低廉的新药,短期边际成本接近)与动态效率(价格高的新药,维持创新的激励)之间的冲突是一个深刻而持久的冲突,因为将新药推向市场的成本很高。近年来急剧增加,这种权衡变​​得越来越严重。解决静态与动态效率冲突的方法可能是未来十年制药行业面临的最重要的单个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号