首页> 外文期刊>The journal of economic perspectives >Toward a Cost-of-Living Index: Progress and Prospects
【24h】

Toward a Cost-of-Living Index: Progress and Prospects

机译:迈向生活成本指数:进展与前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Almost anyone with an interest in consumer price trends wants to know how those trends affect consumers, and, in principle, that effect is best captured by an appropriate cost-of-living index. It therefore seems curious that so few of the statistical offices around the world have adopted the cost-of-living index objective for their consumer price indexes. "Accurately tracking the cost of purchasing a fixed market basket of goods and services" no doubt offers a more comfortable standard for a statistical agency to aspire to than "accurately tracking the cost of living." But if the latter is what one really would like to measure, it seems better just to say so. For some years, the theory of the cost-of-living index has guided Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) decisions about the Consumer Price Index (CPI), and in the recent past, the agency has stated more explicitly that the goal for the CPI program is to approximate a "conditional" cost-of-living index―that is, an index that measures changes in the cost of living that are due to changes in prices of goods and services, conditional on other outside influences that affect the standard of living remaining unchanged. It may be that a true cost-of-living index is unattainable as a practical matter. Still, the Consumer Price Index surely can be moved closer to that ultimate objective, and the theory of the cost-of-living index has the considerable advantage of offering a unified framework for the evaluation of the methods used to produce the CPI. In this paper, I consider the improvements the Bureau of Labor Statistics has made to the Consumer Price Index since the mid-1990s. These include changes designed to make the index more representative of current expenditure patterns; to account for consumer substitution in response to relative price change; and to account for changes in the quality of the goods and services that consumers purchase. Drawing on selected recommendations made by the National Academy of Sciences Panel on Conceptual, Measurement, and Other Statistical Issues in Developing Cost-of-Living Indexes recently chaired by Charles Schultze (hereafter, the Schultze panel), I highlight those additional areas for exploration that I believe have the greatest potential and discuss those areas I believe to be less promising.
机译:几乎所有对消费者价格趋势感兴趣的人都想知道这些趋势如何影响消费者,并且从原则上讲,最好通过适当的生活成本指数来捕捉这种影响。因此,令人感到奇怪的是,全世界很少有统计机构将生活成本指数目标用作其消费者价格指数。与“准确地跟踪生活成本”相比,“准确地跟踪购买固定市场篮子的商品和服务的成本”无疑为统计机构提供了更为舒适的标准。但是,如果后者是真正想要衡量的,那么这样说似乎更好。几年来,生活成本指数理论一直指导着劳工统计局(BLS)关于消费者物价指数(CPI)的决定,并且在最近的几年中,该机构更明确地指出CPI计划近似于“有条件的”生活成本指数,即衡量因商品和服务价格变化而导致的生活成本变化的指数,该条件取决于影响标准的其他外部影响生活水平保持不变。实际上,可能无法获得真正的生活成本指数。当然,消费者价格指数肯定可以接近最终目标,生活成本指数理论具有很大的优势,即可以提供一个统一的框架来评估生产CPI的方法。在本文中,我考虑了自1990年代中期以来美国劳工统计局对消费者物价指数所做的改进。这些变化包括旨在使该指数更能代表当前支出模式的变化;考虑到消费者的替代以响应相对价格变化;并考虑消费者购买的商品和服务的质量变化。根据美国国家科学院关于制定生活成本指数的概念,度量和其他统计问题小组(由查尔·舒尔茨最近担任主席)(以下简称舒尔茨小组)提出的精选建议,我着重指出了那些需要进一步探索的领域我认为潜力最大,并讨论那些我认为前景不太乐观的领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号