首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Literature >The Creation of Inequality: How Our Prehistoric Ancestors Set the Stage for Monarchy, Slavery, and Empire
【24h】

The Creation of Inequality: How Our Prehistoric Ancestors Set the Stage for Monarchy, Slavery, and Empire

机译:不平等的创造:我们的史前祖先如何为君主制,奴隶制和帝国制舞台

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In contrast to most social science research, anthropology considers the full range of human social systems, and looks deep in time, using archaeology to probe social and economic processes beyond the reach of historical records. In light of the increased focus on the political economy of inequality in academic, policy, and activist circles, an examination of the origins of, and cross-cultural variation in, inequality is timely. Kent Flannery and Joyce Marcus (hereafter, F&M) are both eminent archaeologists, each with a lifetime of research in many settings; here, they are clearly writing for the general reader. The volume ranges globally, and over the full span of our species' history (nearly 200,000 years), but with an emphasis on the last few millennia, when most social complexity and inequality arose and spread. The prose is clear, even folksy at times, and generally free of specialist terminology. There are many line drawings (of archaeological sites and artifacts), but no tables or graphs, let alone equations, and the few numbers are mostly dates, population sizes, or site dimensions. The bibliographic notes are copious and indicate wide familiarity with archaeological and ethnographic literature on particular societies; citations to the theoretical or analytical literature are much more selective, even idiosyncratic (on which more, below).
机译:与大多数社会科学研究相反,人类学考虑了人类社会系统的全部范围,并且利用考古学来探究历史记录所无法企及的社会和经济过程,因此具有深远的时代底蕴。鉴于学术界,政策界和维权人士对不平等现象的政治经济学越来越关注,因此,对不平等现象的起源和跨文化差异的研究是及时的。肯特·弗兰纳里(Kent Flannery)和乔伊斯·马库斯(Joyce Marcus,以下简称F&M)都是著名的考古学家,每人在许多地方都终生从事研究工作。在这里,他们显然是为普通读者写的。数量范围遍及全球,涵盖了我们物种历史的整个范围(近200,000年),但重点是最近几千年,那时最复杂的社会问题和不平等现象开始蔓延和蔓延。散文清晰,有时甚至风趣,而且通常没有专业术语。 (考古遗址和文物的)线条图很多,但是没有表格或图表,更不用说方程式了,很少的数字主要是日期,人口规模或遗址面积。书目注释丰富,表明对特定社会的考古学和人种学文献有广泛的了解;对理论或分析文献的引用更具选择性,甚至是特质的(在下文中,更多)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Economic Literature》 |2014年第4期|11601183-1185|共4页
  • 作者

    Eric Alden Smith;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Anthropology, University of Washington;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:32:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号