首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences. Earth and Planetary Sciences >Fast computation of Hankel Transform using orthonormal exponential approximation of complex kernel function
【24h】

Fast computation of Hankel Transform using orthonormal exponential approximation of complex kernel function

机译:使用复核函数的正交指数近似快速计算Hankel变换

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The computation of electromagnetic (EM) fields, for 1-D layered earth model, requires evaluation of Hankel Transform (HT) of the EM kernel function. The digital filtering is the most widely used technique to evaluate HT integrals. However, it has some obvious shortcomings. We present an alternative scheme, based on an orthonormal exponential approximation of the kernel function, for evaluating HT integrals. This approximation of the kernel function was chosen because the analytical solution of HT of an exponential function is readily available in literature. This expansion reduces the integral to a simple algebraic sum. The implementation of such a scheme requires that the weights and the exponents of the exponential function be estimated. The exponents were estimated through a guided search algorithm while the weights were obtained using Marquardt matrix inversion method. The algorithm was tested on analytical HT pairs available in literature. The results are compared with those obtained using the digital filtering technique with Anderson filters. The field curves for four types (A-, K-, H- and Q-type) of 3-layer earth models are generated using the present scheme and compared with the corresponding curves obtained using the Anderson scheme. It is concluded that the present scheme is more accurate than the Anderson scheme.
机译:对于一维分层地球模型,电磁场的计算需要对EM核函数的Hankel变换(HT)进行评估。数字滤波是评估HT积分最广泛使用的技术。但是,它有一些明显的缺点。我们基于核函数的正交指数近似提出一种替代方案,用于评估HT积分。之所以选择核函数的近似值,是因为在文献中很容易获得指数函数HT的解析解。这种扩展将积分减少为简单的代数和。这种方案的实施需要估计指数函数的权重和指数。通过引导搜索算法估计指数,同时使用Marquardt矩阵反演方法获得权重。该算法在文献中可用的分析HT对上进行了测试。将结果与使用带Anderson滤波器的数字滤波技术获得的结果进行比较。使用本方案生成4种类型(A,K,H和Q型)的三层地球模型的场曲线,并将其与使用安德森方案获得的相应曲线进行比较。结论是,本方案比安德森方案更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号