首页> 外文期刊>Journal of documentation >Cognitive styles and search engine preferences Field dependence/independence vs holism/serialism
【24h】

Cognitive styles and search engine preferences Field dependence/independence vs holism/serialism

机译:认知风格和搜索引擎偏好场依存/独立与整体/串行

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - Cognitive style has been identified to be significantly influential in deciding users' preferences of search engines. In particular, Witkin's field dependence/independence has been widely studied in the area of web searching. It has been suggested that this cognitive style has conceptual links with the holism/serialism. This study aims to investigate the differences between the field dependence/independence and holism/serialism.rnDesign/methodology/approach - An empirical study was conducted with 120 students from a UK university. Riding's cognitive style analysis (CSA) and Ford's study preference questionnaire (SPQ) were used to identify the students' cognitive styles. A questionnaire was designed to identify users' preferences for the design of search engines. Data mining techniques were applied to analyse the data obtained from the empirical study.rnFindings - The results highlight three findings. First, a fundamental link is confirmed between the two cognitive styles. Second, the relationship between field dependent users and holists is suggested to be more prominent than that of field independent users and serialists. Third, the interface design preferences of field dependent and field independent users can be split more clearly than those of holists and serialists.rnOriginality/value - The contributions of this study include a deeper understanding of the similarities and differences between field dependence/independence and holists/serialists as well as proposing a novel methodology for data analyses.
机译:目的-认知风格已被确定在决定用户对搜索引擎的偏好方面具有重要影响。特别是,威特金(Witkin)的场依存性/独立性在网络搜索领域已得到广泛研究。已经提出,这种认知风格与整体/串行主义有概念上的联系。这项研究旨在调查场依赖/独立性与整体性/串行性之间的差异。设计/方法论/方法-对来自英国大学的120名学生进行了实证研究。骑术的认知风格分析(CSA)和福特的学习偏好问卷(SPQ)用于识别学生的认知风格。设计了一个调查表,以识别用户对搜索引擎设计的偏好。数据挖掘技术被用于分析从实证研究中获得的数据。研究发现-结果突出了三个发现。首先,确定了两种认知方式之间的基本联系。其次,与现场独立用户和序列主义者相比,与现场独立用户和整体主义者之间的关系被认为更为突出。第三,与整体论者和序列论者的界面设计偏好相比,整体论者和序列论者可以更清楚地划分。原创性/价值-这项研究的贡献包括对场依存性/独立性与整体论者之间异同的更深刻理解。专家,并提出一种新颖的数据分析方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of documentation》 |2010年第4期|P.585-603|共19页
  • 作者单位

    School of Information Systems, Computing, and Mathematics, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK;

    School of Information Systems, Computing, and Mathematics, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology,National Central University, Jhongli City, Taiwan;

    School of Information Systems, Computing, and Mathematics, Brunei University, Uxbridge, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    worldwide web; search engines; user studies; information searches; individual psychology;

    机译:全球资讯网;搜索引擎;用户研究;信息搜索;个人心理学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号