首页> 外文期刊>Journal of design history >Design for Development, ICSID and UNIDO: The Anthropological Turn in 1970s Design
【24h】

Design for Development, ICSID and UNIDO: The Anthropological Turn in 1970s Design

机译:开发设计,ICSID和UNIDO:1970年代的人类学转向设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

From the late 1960s to the close of the 1970s, anthropology and the social sciences coalesced with industrial design, transforming design from a practice whose aesthetic discourse was largely dominated by industrial rationalism, to one of critical intervention with a social agenda. First emerging as a grassroots 'alternative design' movement influenced by workers' unions, design student activists and user-based research methodologies, the coming together of social science (more specifically anthropology) and design by the late 1970s evolved into formal policy within the international industrial design profession. Incorporating previously unexplored documentation of the International Council of Societies of Industrial Design (ICSID) and the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), this article examines the crucial dispersion of anthropology within design, and its culmination in the 'Ahmedabad Declaration' in 1979. Launched at an ICSID/UNIDO congress under the title 'Design and Development', this formalized the emergence of a specific genre of 'development design' based on quasi-anthropological paradigms. The author considers how the informal 'alternative design' movement was incorporated into industrial design's role in 1970s entente Cold War politics; highlighting how anthropological methodologies and considerations were key to securing the design profession's prominence in newly emerging development policies and 'soft power' structures.
机译:从1960年代末到1970年代末,人类学和社会科学与工业设计融合在一起,将设计从一种美学论述主要由工业理性主义主导的实践转变为一项具有社会议程的重要干预措施。最初是受工人工会,设计学生活动家和基于用户的研究方法影响的草根“替代设计”运动,在1970年代后期,社会科学(更具体地讲是人类学)和设计的融合发展成为国际上的正式政策工业设计专业。本文结合了国际工业设计协会理事会(ICSID)和联合国工业发展组织(UNIDO)以前未曾探索过的文献,研究了人类学在设计中的关键分散性,以及在1979年的《艾哈迈达巴德宣言》中达到了顶峰。它是在ICSID / UNIDO大会上以“设计与开发”为标题启动的,正式确定了基于准人类学范式的“开发设计”特定类型的出现。作者考虑了非正式的“替代设计”运动如何在1970年代的工业设计中被纳入冷战政治。着重强调人类学方法论和考虑因素是确保设计专业在新兴发展政策和“软实力”结构中脱颖而出的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号