首页> 外文期刊>Journal of design history >Persian Carpets and the South Kensington Museum: Design, Scholarship and Collecting in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain
【24h】

Persian Carpets and the South Kensington Museum: Design, Scholarship and Collecting in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain

机译:波斯地毯和南肯辛顿博物馆:19世纪晚期英国的设计,奖学金和收藏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article analyzes one aspect of the early historiography of Middle Eastern carpets: namely, how carpets from Persia were acquired, studied and presented in the context of late nineteenth-century British responses to the Orient and industrialization both in Europe and Persia. The discussion centres on the scholarly output and the collecting activities of the South Kensington Museum (now the Victoria and Albert Museum) - an institution that emerged within a landscape of orientalism, capitalist-imperialism, design reform and exhibitionary spectacle. By examining the works of key figures connected to the museum, such as Owen Jones, George Birdwood, Robert Murdoch Smith and William Morris, the present study discusses how the Victorian art establishment shaped discussions on taste, authenticity, taxonomy and commodification. It argues that such activities have helped to entrench a hierarchical and evolutionary understanding of 'Oriental' carpets that privileges imperial Safavid specimens over market-led Qajar and machine-made British examples.
机译:本文分析了中东地毯的早期历史学的一个方面:即如何在十九世纪末英国对东方和欧洲及波斯工业化的回应的背景下,从波斯地毯中获得,研究和展示波斯地毯。讨论的重点是南肯辛顿博物馆(现为维多利亚和阿尔伯特博物馆)的学术成果和收藏活动,该博物馆是在东方主义,资本主义帝国主义,设计改革和展览奇观中兴起的。通过研究与博物馆有关的主要人物的作品,例如欧文·琼斯,乔治·伯德伍德,罗伯特·默多克·史密斯和威廉·莫里斯,本研究讨论了维多利亚时代的艺术机构如何塑造关于品位,真实性,分类法和商品化的讨论。它认为,此类活动有助于加强对“东方”地毯的等级和进化的理解,这种特权使皇家萨法维德的标本比市场主导的卡贾尔和英国制造的机器更具有特权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号