首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy research >Evaluation of different preservation techniques on the storage potential of Kefir grains.
【24h】

Evaluation of different preservation techniques on the storage potential of Kefir grains.

机译:评价不同的保存技术对开菲尔谷物的储存潜力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The impact of 4 different preservation techniques (frozen stored without milk at -18 degrees C, refrigerated at 4 degrees C, air dried at room temperature for 3 weeks in a dessicator or freeze-dried) on the substrate pH, titratable acidity (TA), lactose and lactic acid levels of kefir was investigated at 0, 1, 3 and 10 months of storage. Fermentation was conducted using Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, cremoris and diacetylactis. It was shown that the frozen and refrigerated kefir grains developed acidic and alcoholic odours after 10 months of storage. The lyophilized grain retained the colour and appearance of fresh grains but were extremely brittle, while the air-dried grains developed a brownish colour, foul odour and a tough structure, followed by mycelial fungal growth after 2 weeks of drying. Mass losses over the 10-month storage period were small and insignificant in the frozen, refrigerated and lyophilized grains. Storage period had very little effects on the pH of frozen grains. Refrigerated and air-dried grains showed good retention of the initial acidification activity, while the decrease in the pH of lyophilized grain was significantly slower compared to the other treatments after 3 and 10 months of storage. The TA profiles of frozen and refrigerated grains was similar to that of milk stored at 10-18 h (0.76-0.88%) after 1 and 3 months but then decreased after 10 months of storage. The TA of the air-dried and lyophilized grains also significantly decreased at 10 months of storage. There were no significant differences in the lactose contents of the grains in all treatments after 10 months of storage, while the highest production of lactic acid was observed in frozen and refrigerated grains after 10 h of fermentation. However, the lactic acid contents were similar in all treatments after 18 h of fermentation. In conclusion, all of the preservation techniques used in this study are suitable for the preservation of kefir grains. However, air drying is not recommended for commercial use due to the unacceptable colour and smell of the grains.
机译:4种不同的保存技术(在-18摄氏度下冷冻保存,不加牛奶,在4摄氏度下冷藏,在室温下空气干燥,干燥3周或冷冻干燥)对底物pH,可滴定酸度(TA)的影响,在储存0、1、3和10个月时研究了开菲尔的乳糖和乳酸水平。使用乳酸乳球菌亚种进行发酵。乳酸,creemoris和diacetylactis。结果表明,冷冻和冷藏的开菲尔谷物在储存10个月后会产生酸性和酒精性气味。冻干的谷物保留了新鲜谷物的颜色和外观,但非常脆,而风干的谷物则显示出褐色,臭味和坚韧的结构,干燥2周后其菌丝真菌生长。冷冻,冷藏和冻干谷物在10个月的储存期内的质量损失很小且微不足道。贮藏期对冷冻谷物的pH影响很小。冷藏和风干的谷物显示出良好的初始酸化活性保留能力,而冷冻干燥谷物的pH值在储存3个月和10个月后,其下降速度明显慢于其他处理方法。冷冻和冷藏谷物的TA曲线与在1和3个月后储存10-18小时(0.76-0.88%)的牛奶相似,但在储存10个月后降低。风干和冻干谷物的TA在储存10个月时也显着降低。贮藏10个月后,所有处理中谷物的乳糖含量均无显着差异,而发酵和冷藏的谷物在发酵10小时后,乳酸产量最高。但是,发酵18小时后所有处理中的乳酸含量均相似。总之,本研究中使用的所有保存技术均适用于开菲尔粒的保存。但是,由于谷物的颜色和气味不可接受,不建议将空气干燥用于商业用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号