首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >Assisting Suicide And The Discretion To Prosecute: Hard Cases And Good Law?
【24h】

Assisting Suicide And The Discretion To Prosecute: Hard Cases And Good Law?

机译:协助自杀和自由裁量权:重案和良好法律?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The claimant, Debbie Purdy, suffers from multiple sclerosis. She anticipates that her condition will worsen to a point at which her continuing existence will become unbearable. At this point she will want to end her own life. As she would need help to do this, she would have to travel to a jurisdiction in which assisted suicide is lawful. She would be unable to do this without the assistance of her husband who would then be liable to prosecution under the Suicide Act 1961, s. 2(1) which provides:rnA person who aids, abets, counsels or procures the suicide of another, or an attempt by another to commit suicide, shall be liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.
机译:索赔人黛比·普迪(Debbie Purdy)患有多发性硬化症。她预计自己的病情会恶化到无法继续生存的地步。此时,她将要结束自己的生活。因为她需要帮助才能做到这一点,所以她将不得不前往司法协助自杀的司法管辖区。如果没有丈夫的帮助,她将无法做到这一点,丈夫将根据《 1961年自杀法》第s条受到起诉。第2条第(1)款规定:协助,教counsel,劝诱或促成他人自杀,或他人企图自杀的人,一经循公诉程序定罪,可处不超过14年徒刑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号