首页> 外文期刊>The journal of corporate accounting & finance >Bank corporate governance in Australia: Is there a conflict between the existing corporate culture and the Anglo-Saxon model of corporate governance?
【24h】

Bank corporate governance in Australia: Is there a conflict between the existing corporate culture and the Anglo-Saxon model of corporate governance?

机译:澳大利亚银行公司治理:现有的企业文化与公司治理模式之间是否存在冲突?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article identifies bank governance deficit as a contributor to the misconduct identified in the recent Banking Royal Commission into misconduct in banks, superannuation, and financial services in Australia. Literature review has been conducted to identify the key issues of theory, frameworks, sources of corporate governance (CG), CG models, board skills, and age as factors in CG. The analysis finds that some of the governance requirements are well in place in Australia, the apparent failure of CG not being able to constrain misconduct in banks remains a puzzle. We question whether Anglo-Saxon model of short-termism has permeated bank organization culture beyond fixation. We suggest various opportunities for further research to try to narrow the gap between governance deficit and conduct in the banking sector.
机译:本文将银行治理赤字确定为近期银行皇家委员会在澳大利亚银行,退休金和金融服务中违反行为不当行为所确定的不当行为的贡献者。已经进行了文献综述,以确定CG中的理论,框架,公司治理来源(CG),CG模型,董事会技能和年龄的关键问题。分析发现,一些治理要求在澳大利亚有很好的地方,CG的明显失败无法限制银行在银行中的不当行为仍然是一个难题。我们疑问八斯撒克逊短期主义模型是否已经超越了超越固定的银行组织文化。我们为进一步研究建议提供各种机会,以促进银行业治理赤字与行为之间的差距。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号