...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer sciences >Analytical Analysis of In-Band Crosstalk, Out-of-Band Crosstalk and GVD-Based Power Penalties in DWDM and TDM/DWDM-PONS
【24h】

Analytical Analysis of In-Band Crosstalk, Out-of-Band Crosstalk and GVD-Based Power Penalties in DWDM and TDM/DWDM-PONS

机译:DWDM和TDM / DWDM-PONS中带内串扰,带外串扰和基于GVD的功率损失的分析分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In addition to the ever-increasing demand for broader bandwidth per user, which results from the continuous development of new bandwidth-hungry services and applications, the consequent upgrade from the currently deployed Time-Division Multiplexing Passive Optical Networks (TDM-PONs) to Next-Generation Optical Access Networks (NG-OANs) has become inevitable. Different architectures for creating a NG-OAN have been proposed in the literature. Among those architectures, the DWDM and TDM/DWDM-Based OANs are very promising candidates. They were mainly proposed to exploit the large wavelength counts available in the fibre (its virtual unlimited bandwidth) to achieve a significant increase in the system capacity. Moreover, they allow coexistence in an open access environment among different network operators. In this study, we first analyze the impact of in-band crosstalk, out-of-band crosstalk to evaluate the performance of the Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG). The reason to focus on the AWG is due to this optical device is used almost in all DWDM and TDM/WDM-PONs. We then turn our attention to analyze the impact of group velocity dispersion GVD to estimate the maximum allowable bit rate for optical transmission without the need for using a Dispersion Management Technique (DMT) and/or a Forward Error Correction Technique (FECT). The analysis was performed using Matlab software (The Math works, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and confirms that the in-band crosstalk has a stronger effect than the out-of-band crosstalk because its noise floor is reached at a lower crosstalk noise and with fewer crosstalk components. The in-band crosstalk noise should be kept below -37 dB and -34 dB to maintain a power penalty of less than 1 dB if 15 and 7 in-band crosstalk components are considered, respectively. The out-of-band crosstalk noise should be kept below -20.3 dB and -17.18 dB to maintain a power penalty of less than 1 dB if 240 and 56 out-of-band crosstalk components are considered, respectively. It was observed that the GVD noise floor is reached at a shorter fiber length as the bit rate increases and it was confirmed that a significant improvement in which the GVD noise floor is reached at longer fiber can be achieved if an externally modulated, small spectral-width source is used when a bit rate of 622 Mbps, 1 Gps, or 2.5 Gbps is used. However, a dispersion management technique becomes necessary if the bit rate increases to 10 Gbps or more.
机译:除了不断增长的对新的带宽渴求服务和应用的不断发展导致对每用户更宽带宽的需求不断增长外,其结果是从当前部署的时分复用无源光网络(TDM-PON)升级到下一代一代光接入网(NG-OAN)已成为必然。在文献中已经提出了用于创建NG-OAN的不同架构。在那些架构中,基于DWDM和基于TDM / DWDM的OAN是非常有前途的候选方案。提出它们的主要目的是利用光纤中可用的大波长计数(其虚拟无限带宽)来显着提高系统容量。而且,它们允许在不同网络运营商之间的开放访问环境中共存。在这项研究中,我们首先分析带内串扰,带外串扰的影响,以评估阵列波导光栅(AWG)的性能。之所以关注AWG,是因为几乎所有DWDM和TDM / WDM-PON中都使用了这种光学设备。然后,我们将注意力转向分析群速度色散GVD的影响,以估计光传输的最大允许比特率,而无需使用色散管理技术(DMT)和/或前向纠错技术(FECT)。该分析是使用Matlab软件(美国马萨诸塞州内蒂克市The Math works,Inc.)进行的,确认了带内串扰的影响要比带外串扰更强,因为其本底噪声较低。串扰噪声和较少的串扰成分。如果分别考虑15个和7个带内串扰分量,则带内串扰噪声应保持在-37 dB和-34 dB以下,以保持小于1 dB的功率损失。如果分别考虑240个和56个带外串扰分量,则带外串扰噪声应保持在-20.3 dB和-17.18 dB以下,以保持小于1 dB的功率损失。可以观察到,随着比特率的增加,在较短的光纤长度处可以达到GVD噪声本底,并且可以证实,如果采用外部调制的,较小的频谱,则可以在较长的光纤上达到GVD噪声本底的显着改善。当使用622 Mbps,1 Gps或2.5 Gbps的比特率时,使用width源。但是,如果比特率增加到10 Gbps或更高,则必须使用色散管理技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号