>Three aspects of Kaber’s paper are discussed: (a) the origins of the level-of-automation concept as related to various misconceptions in the lite'/> Comments on 'Issues in Human-Automation Interaction Modeling: Presumptive Aspects of Frameworks of Types and Levels of Automation'
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making >Comments on 'Issues in Human-Automation Interaction Modeling: Presumptive Aspects of Frameworks of Types and Levels of Automation'
【24h】

Comments on 'Issues in Human-Automation Interaction Modeling: Presumptive Aspects of Frameworks of Types and Levels of Automation'

机译:关于“人与自动化交互模型中的问题:自动化类型和水平的框架的假定方面”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

>Three aspects of Kaber’s paper are discussed: (a) the origins of the level-of-automation concept as related to various misconceptions in the literature regarding the intent of the original paper; (b) distinctions between descriptive, predictive, presumptive, and normative models; and (c) the difficulty, even impossibility, of making level-of-automation taxonomies into readily useful tools for system design.
机译: >讨论了Kaber论文的三个方面:(a)与各种相关的自动化水平概念的起源文献中关于原始论文意图的误解; (b)描述性,预测性,推定性和规范性模型之间的区别; (c)将自动化级别的分类法变成易于使用的系统设计工具的困难,甚至是不可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号