首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Techno-economic and environmental assessment of upgrading alternatives for sludge stabilization in municipal wastewater treatment plants
【24h】

Techno-economic and environmental assessment of upgrading alternatives for sludge stabilization in municipal wastewater treatment plants

机译:对市政污水处理厂污泥稳定化升级替代品进行技术经济和环境评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this work we have performed a feasibility study of two upgrading alternatives for sewage sludge stabilization aimed to the reduction of the produced sludge and to the improvement of its qualitative characteristics with respect to its final destination: agricultural use or incineration. The first upgrading (1) proposes the separated thickening: primary sludge is thickened by gravity while dynamic thickening is applied to secondary sludge. The second upgrading (2) introduces a post-aerobic digestion stage (after the anaerobic one), in addition to separate thickening. Technical-economic and environmental assessments have been performed in comparison to a conventional wastewater treatment plant, which operates with gravity thickening and anaerobic digestion of mixed sludge. In the post-aerobic stage, operated with intermittent aeration, additional volatile solids removal of 45% and nitrification and denitrification efficiencies of 97% and 70%, respectively, were achieved. Both upgrading alternatives gained a positive technical evaluation with the only exceptions of the item "Thermal energy consumption" in upgrading 1 for agricultural reuse, and, to a minor extent, the "Energy available for external recovery" for incineration in both upgrading options. Cost analysis showed that the two upgrading alternatives are generally cheaper than the conventional plant, even if the results are dependent on local conditions, which have to be considered. Results of the environmental assessment showed that the upgrades with incineration perform better than the reference for all impact categories except freshwater eutrophication, with upgrading 2 as the best option. For the agricultural use, different results were obtained for the different impact categories with critical aspects mainly related to phosphorus and ammonia emissions for upgrading 1. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项工作中,我们对污水污泥稳定化的两种升级替代方案进行了可行性研究,目的是减少产生的污泥并改善其在最终目的地方面的质量特征:农业用途或焚化。第一次升级(1)提出了分离的增稠方法:主要污泥在重力作用下增稠,而动态增稠应用于次生污泥。第二次升级(2)除了单独的增稠之外,还引入了好氧后消化阶段(在厌氧消化之后)。与常规废水处理厂相比,已进行了技术经济和环境评估,常规废水处理厂采用重力浓缩和厌氧消化混合污泥的方式运行。在需氧后阶段,通过间歇曝气运行,分别实现了45%的额外挥发性固体去除以及97%和70%的硝化和反硝化效率。两种升级备选方案均获得了积极的技术评估,唯一的例外是升级用于农业再利用的1中的“热能消耗”,以及在较小程度上的两种升级方案中的“可用于外部回收的能源”。成本分析表明,这两种升级方案通常比传统工厂便宜,即使结果取决于当地条件也必须考虑。环境评估结果表明,除淡水富营养化外,焚烧的升级效果优于所有影响类别的参考值,升级2是最佳选择。对于农业用途,针对不同的影响类别获得了不同的结果,其关键方面主要涉及磷和氨的排放以进行升级。1.(C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号