首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) for municipal heating in China: analysis of haze pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions
【24h】

Coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) for municipal heating in China: analysis of haze pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions

机译:中国用于城市取暖的煤基合成天然气(SNG):雾霾污染物和温室气体(GHGs)排放的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Municipal heating by coal contributes considerably to the haze pollution in Chinese cities during cold period, e.g., Beijing 53%. It is widely considered that, as a supplement of natural gas, the use of coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) to replace coal for municipal heating is conductive to mitigate the haze pollution in metropolitan areas. Would it still be a good alternative if the whole life cycle of SNG were taken into consideration? In this study, SNG as an alternative for municipal heating is analyzed in comparison with coal. To target cleaner production, life cycle assessment methodology is used to analyze SNG contribution to haze pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions, as well as energy consumption. Compared to coal heating route, SNG heating route could reduce 44% of the haze pollutants emissions from life. cycle perspective and up to 98% of the emissions in urban area. Thus, if municipal heating were entirely supplied by natural gas and SNG, there would be 52% less haze pollutants emissions in winter of Beijing. However, this "good" performance is at the cost of transferring haze pollutants emissions from urban areas to SNG-producing regions. It is also at the cost of consuming 90% more coal and emitting 65% more GHGs than the coal heating route from life cycle point of view. To tackle the problems of haze pollutants transfer and the increase of GHGs emissions, the paper suggests implementing ecological compensation and carbon tax policies in the coal-based SNG industry. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在寒冷时期,煤炭的城市取暖对中国城市的霾污染有很大贡献,例如北京的53%。人们普遍认为,作为天然气的补充,使用煤基合成天然气(SNG)代替煤炭来进行城市取暖有助于减轻大都市地区的霾污染。如果考虑到SNG的整个生命周期,它仍然是一个很好的选择吗?在这项研究中,与煤相比,分析了SNG作为城市供热的替代方案。为了针对清洁生产,使用生命周期评估方法来分析SNG对霾污染物和温室气体(GHGs)排放以及能源消耗的贡献。相较于煤加热路线,SNG加热路线可减少生活中烟霾污染物排放的44%。循环角度来看,可达到市区排放量的98%。因此,如果市政供暖完全由天然气和SNG提供,那么北京冬季的雾霾污染物排放量将减少52%。但是,这种“良好”性能是以将雾霾污染物排放从市区转移到SNG生产地区为代价的。从生命周期的角度来看,与煤炭加热路线相比,它的消耗是煤炭消耗量增加90%,温室气体排放量增加65%。为了解决雾霾污染物转移和温室气体排放增加的问题,本文建议在煤制天然气行业中实施生态补偿和碳税政策。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号