首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Multi-product carbon footprint assessment for low-rank coal-based acetylene manufacturing process
【24h】

Multi-product carbon footprint assessment for low-rank coal-based acetylene manufacturing process

机译:低品位煤基乙炔生产过程的多产品碳足迹评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The coal to acetylene process is still commonly used nowadays in some countries like China of which their energy structure relies deeply on coal. Compared with the coal to acetylene process using electrothermal method in tradition, the oxygen-thermal method consumes less electricity and produces furnace gas with higher carbon monoxide (CO) purity. However, the potential to reduce carbon emission of the oxygen-thermal method is unclear which makes it necessary to evaluate the carbon footprint of oxygen-thermal coal to acetylene process. To accurately define the process is the first challenge in this research. Given that the coal to acetylene process generates acetylene and CO simultaneously, it is safe to regard this process as a multi-product process. Another challenge in this study is the shortage of relevant literatures on multi-product chemical. processes, especially for the coal to acetylene process. In fact, a large majority of the current literatures try to use a general way to solve the ecological problems, which is not suitable for assessing the coal to acetylene process. Therefore, in this research, more attentions have been paid to adapting the traditional carbon footprint assessment to the coal to acetylene process, including selecting a proper boundary, collecting reasonable data and adopting appropriate allocation rules. The study examined the case based on the differences between the global warming potential (GWP) factors, the greenhouse gases (GHG) emission factors and the activity data of the systems, and noted that the GWP and GHG emission factors are usually regarded as given values while the activity data depends on characteristic parameters of the system. Thus, the activity data of the system should be verified repeatedly through the mass balance, carbon accounting and energy balance of the system. Moreover, individual contribution to the carbon footprint from each product should be considered in the aggregate carbon footprint, since the coal to acetylene process features multi-product outputs. Finally, recommendations for minimizing carbon emission of the system were presented. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:如今,在一些国家(如中国)的能源结构高度依赖于煤炭,如今仍普遍采用煤制乙炔工艺。与传统上使用电热法的煤制乙炔工艺相比,氧热法耗电少,产生的一氧化碳(CO)纯度更高。然而,降低氧热法碳排放的潜力尚不清楚,这使得有必要评估氧热煤制乙炔工艺的碳足迹。准确定义过程是这项研究的第一个挑战。鉴于煤制乙炔工艺会同时生成乙炔和CO,因此可以安全地将此工艺视为多产品工艺。这项研究中的另一个挑战是缺乏有关多产品化学的相关文献。过程,特别是用于煤制乙炔的过程。实际上,当前的大多数文献都试图使用一种通用的方法来解决生态问题,这不适用于评估煤制乙炔的过程。因此,在这项研究中,已将更多的注意力放在使传统的碳足迹评估适应煤制乙炔工艺上,包括选择合适的边界,收集合理的数据和采用合适的分配规则。该研究基于全球变暖潜势(GWP)因子,温室气体(GHG)排放因子和系统活动数据之间的差异对案例进行了研究,并指出通常将GWP和GHG排放因子视为给定值活动数据取决于系统的特征参数。因此,应该通过系统的质量平衡,碳核算和能量平衡来反复验证系统的活动数据。此外,由于煤制乙炔工艺具有多种产品输出,因此应在总碳足迹中考虑每种产品对碳足迹的单独贡献。最后,提出了减少系统碳排放的建议。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号