首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Implications of the 11th and 12th Five-Year Plans for energy conservation and CO2 and air pollutants reduction: a case study from the city of Urumqi, China
【24h】

Implications of the 11th and 12th Five-Year Plans for energy conservation and CO2 and air pollutants reduction: a case study from the city of Urumqi, China

机译:“十一五”和“十二五”规划对节能减排和减少二氧化碳和空气污染物的影响:以中国乌鲁木齐市为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The development of the economy, energy conservation and environmental protection should all have similar importance within China's Five-Year Plans, and be implemented in parallel and in interaction with each other. In practice however it is debatable whether they are implemented in a harmonious way. In this case study, which takes place in the city of Urumqi, we identify the elements within the 11th and 12th Five-Year Plans pertaining to economic policy, energy policy and environmental policy, i.e. the 3E policies, and discuss their respective and collective impacts on energy conservation and CO2 and air pollutants reduction. A bottom-up simulation model is built based on the Long Range Energy Alternatives Planning System (LEAP) to simulate the effects of these policies. It is shown that the excessive pursuit of economic growth during the 11th Five Year Plan led to mounting energy consumption and pollutant emissions, and environmental policy only had an obvious effect on the desulfurization of the power industry. On the other hand, during the 12th Five-Year Plan period, the structural adjustment promoted by the economic policy enhanced energy conservation and reduced emissions of pollutants. Energy policy played an important role in the reduction of air pollutants. Moreover environmental policy was strengthened because binding targets on total emissions were set for more pollutants, but there were slightly increased CO2 emissions due to employing more end-of-pipe measures of emission reduction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在中国的“五年计划”中,经济,节能和环保的发展都应具有同等重要的意义,并应相互平行,相互影响地加以实施。然而,在实践中,是否以和谐的方式实施它们尚有争议。在这个乌鲁木齐市的案例研究中,我们确定了“十一五”和“十二五”规划中与经济政策,能源政策和环境政策(即3E政策)有关的要素,并讨论了它们各自和集体的影响在节能和减少二氧化碳和空气污染物方面。基于远程能源替代计划系统(LEAP)建立了自下而上的模拟模型,以模拟这些政策的效果。研究表明,“十一五”期间对经济增长的过度追求导致能源消耗和污染物排放增加,而环境政策仅对电力行业的脱硫产生了明显影响。另一方面,在“十二五”期间,经济政策推动的结构调整加强了节能,减少了污染物的排放。能源政策在减少空气污染物方面发挥了重要作用。此外,由于对总排放量设定了更多污染物的约束性目标,因此环境政策得到了加强,但是由于采取了更多的末端减排措施,二氧化碳排放量略有增加。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号