首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Multidimensional versus unidimensional measures in assessing national culture values: The Hofstede VSM 94 example
【24h】

Multidimensional versus unidimensional measures in assessing national culture values: The Hofstede VSM 94 example

机译:评估国家文化价值的多维和单维度度量:Hofstede VSM 94示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent attention in the national culture literature has been given to the question of applying sociological, group-level measures to psychological, individual-level phenomenon. The current study addresses this measurement issue by examining the most widely used measures of national culture values: those developed by Hofstede and his colleagues using the Value Survey Module (VSM) and an updated version, the VSM 94. Hofstede's country-level index scores are applied by some researchers on an individual level, which was never the intended use of the indices. In doing so, the unidimensional aspects of these indices fail to represent the multidimensional nature of an individual's cultural values. The current research involved two large studies, including data collected from over 1400 subjects in four countries. Analysis of the validity of the VSM 94 measures reveals a number of shortcomings. Our findings demonstrate the unsuitability of using measures designed for unidimensional constructs to represent multidimensional, individual-level traits.
机译:在国家文化文献中,最近的关注点是将社会学,群体层面的措施应用于心理,个体层面的现象。当前的研究通过检查使用最广泛的民族文化价值衡量标准来解决这一衡量问题:霍夫斯蒂德及其同事使用价值调查模块(VSM)和更新版本VSM 94制定的衡量标准。霍夫斯蒂德的国家级指数得分是一些研究人员在个人层面上的应用,这从来不是指数的预期用途。这样做,这些指标的一维方面无法代表一个人的文化价值的多维性质。当前的研究涉及两项大型研究,包括从四个国家的1400多个主题中收集的数据。对VSM 94措施有效性的分析揭示了许多缺陷。我们的发现表明,不适合使用针对一维结构设计的方法来代表多维的个人水平特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号