首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Illusions of truth-Experimental insights into human and algorithmic detections of fake online reviews
【24h】

Illusions of truth-Experimental insights into human and algorithmic detections of fake online reviews

机译:真相的错觉-对虚假在线评论进行人工和算法检测的实验性见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The issue of fake online reviews is increasingly relevant due to the growing importance of online reviews to consumers and the growing frequency of deceptive corporate practices. It is, therefore, necessary to be able to detect fake online reviews. An experiment with 1041 respondents allowed us to create two pools of reviews (fake and truthful) and compare them for psycholinguistic deception cues. The resulting automated tool accounted for review valence and incentive and detected deceptive reviews with 81% accuracy. A follow-up experiment with 407 consumers showed that humans have only a 57% accuracy of detection, even when a deception mindset is activated with information on cues of fake online reviews. Therefore, micro-linguistic automated detection can be used to filter the content of reviewing websites to protect online users. Our independent analysis of reviewing websites confirms the presence of dubious content and, therefore, the need to introduce more sophisticated filtering approaches.
机译:由于在线评论对消费者的重要性日益提高以及欺骗性的公司行为频发,假冒在线评论的问题变得越来越重要。因此,有必要能够检测到虚假的在线评论。对1041名受访者进行的一项实验使我们能够创建两个评论库(虚假和真实),并比较它们的心理语言欺骗线索。所产生的自动化工具说明了评论的效价和动机,并检测出具有欺骗性的评论,准确率为81%。一项针对407位消费者的后续实验表明,即使使用有关虚假在线评论提示的信息激活了欺骗思维,人类的检测准确率也只有57%。因此,可以使用微语言自动检测来过滤审阅网站的内容,以保护在线用户。我们对评论网站的独立分析证实了可疑内容的存在,因此需要引入更复杂的过滤方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号