首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Moral Issues and Gender Differences in Ethical Judgment using Reidenbach and Robin's (1990) Multidimensional Ethics Scale: Implications in Teaching of Business Ethics
【24h】

Moral Issues and Gender Differences in Ethical Judgment using Reidenbach and Robin's (1990) Multidimensional Ethics Scale: Implications in Teaching of Business Ethics

机译:使用Reidenbach和Robin(1990)的多维道德量表在道德判断中的道德问题和性别差异:对商业道德教学的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, we examined moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin's [Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1990) 639) multidimensional ethics scale (MES). A total of 340 undergraduate students were asked to provide ethical judgment by rating three moral issues in the MES labeled: 'sales', 'auto', and 'retail' using three ethics theories: moral equity, relativism, and contractualism. We found that female students' ratings of ethical judgment were consistently higher than that of male students across two out of three moral issues examined (i.e., sales and retails) and ethics theories; providing support for Eagly's
机译:在这项研究中,我们使用Reidenbach和Robin的[Journal of Business Ethics 9(1990)639)多维伦理量表(MES)来研究道德问题和性别判断中的性别差异。总共340名本科生被要求通过使用以下三种道德理论对MES中标记为“销售”,“汽车”和“零售”的三个道德问题进行评级来提供道德判断,这三个道德理论是:道德公平,相对主义和契约主义。我们发现,在所研究的三个道德问题(即销售和零售)和道德理论中,有两个问题的女学生对道德判断的评价一直高于男学生。为Eagly提供支持

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号