首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom
【24h】

Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom

机译:重新思考社会企业家精神的空间:权力,主体性和自由实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article identifies power, subjectivity, and practices of freedom as neglected but significant elements for understanding the ethics of social entrepreneurship. While the ethics of social entrepreneurship is typically conceptualized in conjunction with innate properties or moral commitments of the individual, we problematize this view based on its presupposition of an essentialist conception of the authentic subject. We offer, based on Foucault's ethical oeuvre, a practice-based alternative which sees ethics as being exercised through a critical and creative dealing with the limits imposed by power, notably as they pertain to the conditioning of the neoliberal subject. To this end, we first draw on prior research which looks at how practitioners of social enterprises engage with government policies that demand that they should act and think more like prototypical entrepreneurs. Instead of simply endorsing the kind of entrepreneurial subjectivity implied in prevailing policies, our results indicate that practitioners are mostly reluctant to identify themselves with the invocation of governmental power, often rejecting the subjectivity offered to them by discourse. Conceiving these acts of resistance as emblematic of how social entrepreneurs practice ethics by retaining a skeptical attitude toward attempts that seek to determine who they should be and how they should live, we introduce three vignettes that illustrate how practices of freedom relate to critique, the care for others, and reflected choice. We conclude that a practice-based approach of ethics can advance our understanding of how social entrepreneurs actively produce conditions of freedom for themselves as well as for others without supposing a 'true self' or a utopian space of liberty beyond power.
机译:本文将权力,主观性和自由实践确定为被理解但对理解社会企业家精神具有重要意义的要素。虽然通常将社会企业家精神与个人的先天特性或道德承诺结合在一起进行概念化,但我们基于这种观点的前提是对这种观点的质疑,这种观点是对真实主体的本质主义概念的预设。我们基于福柯的伦理思想提出了一种基于实践的选择,认为伦理学是通过批判性和创造性地处理权力所施加的限制而行使的,特别是因为它们与新自由主义主体的条件有关。为此,我们首先借鉴先前的研究,研究社会企业的从业者如何与政府政策互动,要求他们采取行动并像原型企业家那样思考。我们的结果表明,从业人员大多不愿认同政府权力的调用,而常常拒绝话语赋予他们的主观性,而不是简单地认可现行政策所暗示的企业家主观性。这些抵制行为是社会企业家如何通过对试图确定自己应该是​​谁以及应该如何生活的尝试持怀疑态度来象征社会企业家如何实践道德的象征,我们介绍了三种短篇小说,阐述了自由实践与批判,关怀如何相关为他人,体现选择。我们得出结论,基于实践的伦理学方法可以增进我们对社会企业家如何积极为自己和他人创造自由条件的理解,而无需假设“真正的自我”或超越权力的乌托邦式自由空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号