...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bridge engineering >Comparative Study of Fatigue Provisions for the AASHTO Fatigue Guide Specifications and LRFR Manual for Evaluation
【24h】

Comparative Study of Fatigue Provisions for the AASHTO Fatigue Guide Specifications and LRFR Manual for Evaluation

机译:AASHTO疲劳指南规范和LRFR评估手册的疲劳规定的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The recently developed Manual for condition evaluation and load and resistance factor rating (LRFR) of highway bridges in 2003 provides an alternative procedure for practicing engineers to evaluate the fatigue life of steel bridge structures. Although the evaluation manual maintains several aspects used in the AASHTO fatigue guide specification in 1990, it also utilizes formulas and values specified in the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications in 1998. A comparative study of the fatigue lives provided by the procedures in the Evaluation manual and the Guide specifications was performed using a life prediction of 14 steel bridges with different structural configurations and various fatigue details. It has been shown that longer predicted fatigue lives are typically obtained when using the Evaluation manual. The ratio of the finite evaluation fatigue lives for the two procedures was found to be in a range of 0.99-2.14.
机译:最近在2003年开发的《公路桥梁状态评估以及载荷和抗力系数额定值(LRFR)手册》为实践工程师提供了评估钢桥结构疲劳寿命的替代程序。尽管评估手册保留了1990年AASHTO疲劳指南规范中使用的几个方面,但它还使用了1998年AASHTO LRFD桥梁设计规范中指定的公式和值。评估手册中的程序提供了疲劳寿命的比较研究, 《指南》的规格是根据14个钢桥的寿命预测进行的,这些钢桥具有不同的结构配置和各种疲劳细节。已经表明,使用《评估手册》时,通常可以获得更长的预期疲劳寿命。两种方法的有限评估疲劳寿命之比在0.99-2.14之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号