首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bridge engineering >Comparison of Block-Shear and Whitmore Section Methods for Load Rating Existing Steel Truss Gusset Plate Connections
【24h】

Comparison of Block-Shear and Whitmore Section Methods for Load Rating Existing Steel Truss Gusset Plate Connections

机译:现有钢桁架角撑板连接的额定荷载的块剪与惠特莫截面法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many transportation agencies are now evaluating and rating their inventory of steel truss bridge gusset plate connections after the collapse of the I35W Bridge in Minneapolis. Modern design methodologies are being used to evaluate inventory gusset plate connections that were designed using allowable stress methods. One such implementation is evaluation of gusset plates using block shear, an approach that was developed well after many of the nation's truss bridges were designed. Vintage designs commonly used the Whitmore section to proportion gusset plate connections. Differences between rating outcomes from block-shear analysis at strength conditions with designs that employed allowable stresses on the Whitmore section method were identified and expected outcomes for rating of gusset plate connections are proposed. Examples are shown to highlight the similarities and differences in these two approaches to assist rating engineers in implementation and expected variabilities on the outcomes based on connection geometric proportions and material properties.
机译:明尼阿波利斯I35W大桥倒塌后,许多运输机构现在正在评估和评估其钢桁架桥衬板连接的库存。现代设计方法被用于评估使用容许应力方法设计的库存角撑板连接。一种这样的实现方式是使用块剪评估角撑板,这种方法在设计了美国许多桁架桥之后得到了很好的发展。复古设计通常使用Whitmore部分来匹配角撑板连接。确定了在强度条件下采用在Whitmore截面方法上采用允许应力的设计进行的块状剪切分析的评级结果之间的差异,并提出了用于扣板连接的评级的预期结果。实例显示了这两种方法的异同,以帮助评级工程师根据连接的几何比例和材料特性,在实施中以及结果的预期差异方面提供帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号