首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biological Education >Why traditional expository teaching-learning approaches may founder? An experimental examination of neural networks in biology learning
【24h】

Why traditional expository teaching-learning approaches may founder? An experimental examination of neural networks in biology learning

机译:为什么传统的说明性教学方法可能会成立?神经网络在生物学学习中的实验检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), this study investigates and discusses neurological explanations for, and the educational implications of, the neural network activations involved in hypothesis‐generating and hypothesis‐understanding for biology education. Two sets of task paradigms about biological phenomena were designed: hypothesis‐generating and hypothesis‐understanding, and 60 healthy participants performed the tasks. fMRI results showed that participants utilised different neural networks during hypothesis‐generating and hypothesis‐understanding, and these networks appeared to have specialised patterns. In other words, these two types of learning strategies related to hypotheses do not share the same brain region or network. Therefore, for biology learning, it might be concluded that hypothesis‐generating and hypothesis‐understanding are operating at differing neural network levels, which causes the difficulty students have generating hypotheses about complicated natural phenomena despite a huge amount of exposure to hypothesis‐understanding during their learning.View full textDownload full textKeywordsbiology learning, hypothesis‐generating, learning strategy, neural network, fMRIRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.548874
机译:使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI),本研究调查并讨论了有关神经网络激活的神经学解释及其对生物学假设的假设(生成和假设)理解的教育意义。设计了关于生物现象的两组任务范式:假设(生成)和假设(理解),有60名健康参与者执行了任务。功能磁共振成像结果表明,参与者在假设的生成和假设的理解过程中使用了不同的神经网络,并且这些网络似乎具有专门的模式。换句话说,与假设有关的这两种学习策略并不共享相同的大脑区域或网络。因此,对于生物学学习而言,可能会得出这样的结论:假设的生成和假设的理解在不同的神经网络水平上运行,这导致尽管存在大量的假设,但学生难以生成关于复杂自然现象的假设。学习过程中的理解。查看全文下载全文关键词生物学学习,假设产生,学习策略,神经网络,fMRI linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布ID:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.548874

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号