首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Asian earth sciences >Structural, metamorphic and geochronological relations between the Zanskar Shear Zone and the Miyar Shear Zone (NW Indian Himalaya): Evidence for two distinct tectonic structures and implications for the evolution of the High Himalayan Crystalline of Zanskar
【24h】

Structural, metamorphic and geochronological relations between the Zanskar Shear Zone and the Miyar Shear Zone (NW Indian Himalaya): Evidence for two distinct tectonic structures and implications for the evolution of the High Himalayan Crystalline of Zanskar

机译:Zanskar剪切带和Miyar剪切带(西北印度喜马拉雅)之间的结构,变质和年代学关系:两个不同构造构造的证据及其对Zanskar高喜马拉雅结晶演化的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The geologic structures and metamorphic zonation of the northwestern Indian Himalaya contrast significantly with those in the central and eastern parts of the range, where the high-grade metamorphic rocks of the High Himalayan Crystalline (HHC) thrust southward over the weakly metamorphosed sediments of the Lesser Himalaya along the Main Central Thrust (MCT). Indeed, the hanging wall of the MCT in the NW Himalaya mainly consists of the greenschist facies metasediments of the Chamba zone, whereas HHC high-grade rocks are exposed more internally in the range as a large-scale dome called the Gianbul dome. This Gianbul dome is bounded by two oppositely directed shear zones, the NE-dipping Zanskar Shear Zone (ZSZ) on the northern flank and the SW-dipping Miyar Shear Zone (MSZ) on the southern limb. Current models for the emplacement of the HHC in NW India as a dome structure differ mainly in terms of the roles played by both the ZSZ and the MSZ during the tectonother-mal evolution of the HHC. In both the channel flow model and wedge extrusion model, the ZSZ acts as a backstop normal fault along which the high-grade metamorphic rocks of the HHC of Zanskar are exhumed. In contrast, the recently proposed tectonic wedging model argues that the ZSZ and the MSZ correspond to one single detachment system that operates as a subhorizontal backthrust off of the MCT. Thus, the kinematic evolution of the two shear zones, the ZSZ and the MSZ, and their structural, metamorphic and chronological relations appear to be diagnostic features for discriminating the different models. In this paper, structural, metamorphic and geochronological data demonstrate that the MSZ and the ZSZ experienced two distinct kinematic evolutions. As such, the data presented in this paper rule out the hypothesis that the MSZ and the ZSZ constitute one single detachment system, as postulated by the tectonic wedging model. Structural, metamorphic and geochronological data are used to present an alternative tectonic model for the large-scale doming in the NW Indian Himalaya involving early NE-directed tectonics, weakness in the upper crust, reduced erosion at the orogenic front and rapid exhumation along both the ZSZ and the MSZ.
机译:印度西北喜马拉雅山的地质结构和变质带与该区域的中部和东部形成鲜明对比,喜马拉雅高结晶(HHC)的高品位变质岩向南冲进小河的弱变质沉积物。喜马拉雅山沿主要中央推力(MCT)。确实,喜马拉雅西北部的MCT悬墙主要由Chamba区域的绿片岩相沉积物组成,而HHC高等级岩石则在该范围内以较大的圆顶(称为Gianbul圆顶)的形式暴露于内部。这个Gianbul穹顶由两个相反方向的剪切带所界定,北侧为NE浸入的Zanskar剪切区(ZSZ),南侧为SW浸入的Miyar剪切区(MSZ)。目前,在印度西北部将HHC安置为穹顶结构的模型主要是在ZHC和MSZ在HHC构造演化过程中所扮演的角色方面不同。在通道流模型和楔形挤压模型中,ZSZ都是逆向正断层,沿着该断层挖掘出Zanskar HHC的高级变质岩。相反,最近提出的构造楔入模型认为ZSZ和MSZ对应于一个单独的分离系统,该分离系统作为MCT的水平下反推作用。因此,ZSZ和MSZ这两个剪切带的运动学演化及其结构,变质和时间关系似乎是区分不同模型的诊断特征。在本文中,结构,变质和地球年代学数据表明,MSZ和ZSZ经历了两种截然不同的运动学演化。因此,本文提供的数据排除了构造楔模型所假设的MSZ和ZSZ构成一个单一分离系统的假设。构造,变质和地球年代学数据被用来为西北喜马拉雅山的大规模隆起提供一种替代的构造模型,包括早期的东北向构造,上地壳的弱化,造山带侵蚀的减少以及沿这两个方向的快速发掘。 ZSZ和MSZ。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号