首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Architectural Engineering >Measuring and Improving Rationale Clarity in a University Office Building Design Process
【24h】

Measuring and Improving Rationale Clarity in a University Office Building Design Process

机译:在大学办公楼设计过程中衡量和改善基本原理的清晰度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper measures and improves the clarity of design rationale on an architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) project and observes the effects. The rationale clarity framework (RCF) defines decisions in terms of components of rationale-managers, stakeholders, designers, gatekeepers, objectives (constraints and goals), alternatives, and analyses (impacts and assessment of stakeholder value). RCF defines relations and conditions of clarity for each component-coherent, concrete, connected, consistent, credible, certain, and correct. Using RCF, the rationale clarity of decisions was observed and documented on an industry case project. A decision-assistance methodology that seeks to clarify rationale, called MACDADI, was then implemented and costs and benefits from each team member's perspective were observed. Future work is identified that can lower costs and increase benefits of clarifying rationale.
机译:本文测量并提高了建筑,工程和建设(AEC)项目的设计原理的清晰度,并观察了效果。基本原理清晰性框架(RCF)根据基本原理经理,利益相关者,设计者,看门人,目标(约束和目标),替代方案和分析(利益相关者价值的影响和评估)的组成部分来定义决策。 RCF为每个组件定义了相关的关系和条件,这些条件是连贯,具体,相互联系,一致,可信,确定和正确的。使用RCF,可以在行业案例项目中观察并记录决策的基本原理。然后实施了旨在阐明原理的决策辅助方法,即MACDADI,并观察了每个团队成员的角度来看的成本和收益。确定了可以降低成本并增加澄清理由的未来工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号