首页> 外文期刊>Journal of architectural education >Preservation, Provocation, and Pedagogy $ Preservation as Provocation: Rethinking Saarinen's Cranbrook Academy of Art Bloomfield Hills, Michigan ACSA Student Competition, 2006-2007
【24h】

Preservation, Provocation, and Pedagogy $ Preservation as Provocation: Rethinking Saarinen's Cranbrook Academy of Art Bloomfield Hills, Michigan ACSA Student Competition, 2006-2007

机译:保存,挑衅和教育学$保存为挑衅:对萨里宁的克兰布鲁克艺术学院的重新思考布卢姆菲尔德希尔斯,密歇根州ACSA学生竞赛,2006-2007年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Competitions intended for architecture students, like many of those entered by professionals, often lack a conceptual imperative. They may address a particular material, technology, building type, or site, but they are intentionally one size fits all, suitable for framing within a broad range of cur-ricular situations. Faculty are free to enhance the specified program with their own brief, process project development through their own pedagogy, or encourage their students' initiative through additional readings, case studies, or theoretical constructs. Preservation as Provocation: Rethinking Saarinen's Cranbrook Academy of Art took the opposite approach, using the competition as a means to frame a new area of architectural concern, "preservation design" with a new pedagogical imperative: to inject preservation directly into the architectural studio environment.
机译:像许多专业人士参加的比赛一样,面向建筑系学生的比赛通常缺乏概念上的要求。它们可能涉及特定的材料,技术,建筑类型或场所,但有意使它们适合所有尺寸,适合在各种课程环境中进行构图。教师可以自由地通过自己的简介来增强指定的程序,通过自己的教学法来开发项目,或者通过其他阅读,案例研究或理论构架来鼓励学生的主动性。保护作为一种挑衅:重新思考萨里宁的克兰布鲁克艺术学院,采取了相反的方法,利用竞争作为一种构筑新的建筑领域的方法,即“保护设计”和一种新的教学法:将保护直接注入到建筑工作室环境中。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号