首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Communication Research >Critically reflexive dialogue and praxis: Academic/practitioner reflections throughout a formative evaluation of Circles((R)) USA
【24h】

Critically reflexive dialogue and praxis: Academic/practitioner reflections throughout a formative evaluation of Circles((R)) USA

机译:批判性反思对话和实践:美国Circles(R)形成性评估中的学术/从业者反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reflections about the use of critically reflexive praxis by academic/practitioners are offered based on a case study of a formative evaluation of Circles((R)) USA, a nonprofit organization coordinating initiatives across the U.S. working to move families out of poverty. Critically reflexive praxis is theorized as featuring several themes including acknowledging different levels of context, critical dialogue with collaborators, engaging cultural difference and intersectionalities, problematizing power relations and relationships among researchers and collaborators, and occurring throughout the research project. Examples of critical dialogic reflexivity and navigating common tensions that emerge throughout such community engagement projects are detailed during three phases: planning and design; fieldwork and interviews; and outcomes, applications, and implications.
机译:基于对Circles(R)美国的形成性评估的案例研究,对学术/从业者使用批判性反身实践进行了反思,这是一个非营利组织,致力于协调美国各地旨在使家庭摆脱贫困的举措。理论上,批判性反思实践具有几个主题,包括承认不同级别的上下文,与合作者进行批判性对话,参与文化差异和交叉性,使研究人员和合作者之间的权力关系和关系成问题,以及贯穿整个研究项目。在以下三个阶段中,详细说明了在整个社区参与项目中出现的重要对话反思性和克服共同紧张气氛的示例:规划和设计;实地考察和访谈;以及结果,应用和含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号