首页> 外文期刊>Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing >Performance analysis of a genetic algorithm based system for wireless mesh networks considering exponential and weibull distributions, DCF and EDCA, and different number of flows
【24h】

Performance analysis of a genetic algorithm based system for wireless mesh networks considering exponential and weibull distributions, DCF and EDCA, and different number of flows

机译:考虑指数和Weibull分布,DCF和EDCA以及不同流量的基于遗传算法的无线网状网络系统的性能分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two WMN architectures (infrastructure/backbone WMNs (I/B WMNs) and Hybrid WMN architectures) considering throughput, delay, jitter and fairness index metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3 and optimized link state routing. We compare the performance of distributed coordination function and enhanced distributed channel access (EDCA) for exponential and Weibull distributions of mesh clients by sending multiple constant bit rate flows in the network. The simulation results show that for exponential distribution, in case of Hybrid WMN, the throughput of both MAC protocols is higher than I/B WMN. For 30 flows, the throughput of EDCA in case of hybrid WMN is about 1.4 times higher than I/B WMN. For Weibull distribution, in case of I/B WMN, the throughput of both MAC protocols is higher than Hybrid WMN. For 30 flows, the throughput of EDCA in case of I/B WMN is about 2.6 times higher than Hybrid WMN. For exponential distribution, the delay and jitter of Hybrid WMN are lower than I/B WMN. For 20 flows, the delay of EDCA in case of hybrid WMN is about 10 times lower than I/B WMN. For Weibull distribution, the delay and jitter of both architectures are almost the same. However, for 10 flows, the delay of I/B WMN is lower compared with hybrid WMN. For exponential distribution, the fairness index of I/B WMN is a little bit higher than hybrid WMN. For Weibull distribution, the fairness index is almost the same for both WMN architectures.
机译:在本文中,我们评估了两种WMN架构(基础结构/骨干WMN(I / B WMN)和混合WMN架构)的性能,其中考虑了吞吐量,延迟,抖动和公平性指标。对于仿真,我们使用了ns-3和优化的链接状态路由。通过在网络中发送多个恒定比特率流,我们比较了网状客户端的指数分布和Weibull分布的分布式协调功能和增强型分布式通道访问(EDCA)的性能。仿真结果表明,对于指数分布,在混合WMN的情况下,两种MAC协议的吞吐量均高于I / B WMN。对于30个流,在混合WMN情况下,EDCA的吞吐量大约是I / B WMN的1.4倍。对于Weibull分发,在I / B WMN的情况下,两个MAC协议的吞吐量都比Hybrid WMN高。对于30个流,在I / B WMN情况下,EDCA的吞吐量大约是Hybrid WMN的2.6倍。对于指数分布,混合WMN的延迟和抖动低于I / B WMN。对于20个流,在混合WMN的情况下,EDCA的延迟大约比I / B WMN低10倍。对于威布尔分布,两种架构的延迟和抖动几乎相同。但是,对于10个流,与混合WMN相比,I / B WMN的延迟要低。对于指数分布,I / B WMN的公平性指数要比混合WMN高一些。对于威布尔分布,两种WMN架构的公平指数几乎相同。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Polytechnic University of Tirana;

    Polytechnic University of Tirana;

    Graduate School of Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT);

    Department of Information Technology, Aleksander Moisiu University of Durres;

    Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT);

    Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:50:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号