...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the air & waste management association >Case Studies on Biological Treatment of Tannery Effluents in India
【24h】

Case Studies on Biological Treatment of Tannery Effluents in India

机译:印度制革废水的生物处理案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents a comparative assessment of the cost and quality of treatment of tannery wastewater in India by two common effluent treatment plants (CETPs) constructed for two tannery clusters, at Jajmau (Kanpur) and at Unnao in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India. The Jajmau plant is upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) process-based, while the Unnao plant is activated sludge process (ASP)-based. Investigations indicated that the ASP-based plant was superior in all respects. Total annualized costs, including capital and operation and maintenance costs, for the UASB and ASP plants were Rs. 4.24 million/million liters per day (MLD) and Rs. 3.36 million/MLD, respectively. Land requirements for the two CETPs were 1.4 hectares/MLD and 0.95 hectares/ MLD, respectively. Moreover, the treated UASB effluent had higher biochemical and chemical oxygen demand (BOD/ COD) and considerable amounts of other undesirable constituents, like chromium (Cr) and sulfide, as compared with the ASP effluent, which had lower BOD/COD and negligible concentration of sulfide and Cr. Sludge production from the UASB-based plant was also higher at 1.4 t/day/MLD, in comparison to the sludge production of 0.8 t/day/MLD for the ASP-based plant. Also, the entire sludge produced in the UASB-based plant was Cr-contaminated and, hence, hazardous, while only a small fraction of the sludge produced in the ASP-based plant was similarly contaminated. The results of this study are at variance with the conventional wisdom of the superiority of anaerobic processes for tannery waste-water treatment in tropical developing countries like India.
机译:本文介绍了对印度制革厂废水处理的成本和质量的比较评估,这两个工厂是为两个制革厂集群而建的,两个污水处理厂分别位于印度斋浦尔的杰伊毛和印度北方邦的昂纳奥。 Jajmau工厂基于上流厌氧污泥床(UASB)工艺,而Unnao工厂则基于活性污泥工艺(ASP)。调查表明,基于ASP的植物在所有方面都优于。 UASB和ASP工厂的年化总成本(包括资本,运营和维护成本)为Rs。每天424万/百万升(MLD)和卢比。分别为336万/ MLD。两个CETP的土地需求分别为1.4公顷/ MLD和0.95公顷/ MLD。而且,与ASP废水相比,处理后的UASB废水具有更高的生化和化学需氧量(BOD / COD)以及大量其他不良成分,例如铬(Cr)和硫化物,BOD / COD较低且浓度可忽略不计硫化物和铬。与基于ASP的工厂的污泥产量为0.8吨/天/ MLD相比,基于UASB的工厂的污泥产量也更高,为1.4吨/天/ MLD。同样,基于UASB的工厂产生的所有污泥均被Cr污染,因此是危险的,而基于ASP的工厂中产生的污泥只有一小部分受到类似的污染。这项研究的结果与传统的认为厌氧工艺在印度等热带发展中国家制革厂废水处理中的优越性相悖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号