...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the air & waste management association >Potential interference bias in ozone standard compliance monitoring
【24h】

Potential interference bias in ozone standard compliance monitoring

机译:臭氧标准符合性监测中的潜在干扰偏差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established a federal reference method (FRM) for ozone (O-3) and allowed for designation of federal equivalent methods (FEMs). However, the ethylene-chemiluminescence FRM for O-3 has been replaced by the UV photometric FEM by most state and local monitoring agencies because of its relative ease of operation. Accumulating evidence indicates that the FEM is prone. to bias under the hot, humid, and stagnant conditions conducive to high O-3 formation. This bias may lead to overreporting hourly O-3 concentrations by as much as 20-40 ppb. Measurement bias is caused by contamination of the O-3 scrubber, a problem that is not detected by dry air calibration. An adequate wet test has not been codified, although a procedure has been proposed for agency consideration. This paper includes documentation of laboratory tests quantifying specific interferant responses, collocated ambient FRM/FEM monitoring results, and smog chamber comparisons of the FRM and FEMs with alternative scrubber designs. As the numbers of reports on monitor interferences have grown, interested parties have called for agency recognition and correction of these biases.
机译:美国环境保护局已建立了臭氧(O-3)的联邦参考方法(FRM),并允许指定联邦等效方法(FEM)。但是,大多数州和地方监测机构已将O-3的乙烯化学发光FRM替换为UV光度FEM,因为它相对易于操作。越来越多的证据表明FEM很容易发生。在炎热,潮湿和停滞的条件下产生偏斜,从而导致高O-3形成。这种偏见可能导致每小时O-3浓度的过量报告多达20-40 ppb。测量偏差是由O-3洗涤塔的污染引起的,这是干燥空气校准无法检测到的问题。尽管已经提议了一种程序供机构考虑,但尚没有编写适当的湿试验。本文包括量化特定干扰物响应的实验室测试文档,并置的环境FRM / FEM监测结果,以及采用替代洗涤塔设计的FRM和FEM烟雾室的比较。随着有关监视器干扰的报告数量不断增加,有关方面呼吁机构认可并纠正这些偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号