首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >FALSE CLAIMS ACT-THE TENTH CIRCUIT FAILS TO FULLY CONSIDER THE HARM TO PUBLIC POLICY CAUSED BY ENFORCEMENT OF A PREFILING RELEASE AGREEMENT IN A QUI TAM ACTION: UNITED STATES EX REL. RITCHIE V. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.
【24h】

FALSE CLAIMS ACT-THE TENTH CIRCUIT FAILS TO FULLY CONSIDER THE HARM TO PUBLIC POLICY CAUSED BY ENFORCEMENT OF A PREFILING RELEASE AGREEMENT IN A QUI TAM ACTION: UNITED STATES EX REL. RITCHIE V. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.

机译:虚假索赔行为-第十电路未能完全考虑到在QUA TAM行动中执行预发布协议所造成的危害公共政策的行为:美国。里奇诉洛克希德马丁公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

United States ex rel. Ritchie v. Lockheed Martin Corp. ana-lyzes the enforceability of a release agreement between private parties where the releasing party subsequently files a qui tam False Claims Act (FCA) suit as a relator for the United States. The qui tam section of the FCA allows private persons to bring actions as relators for the government against those who have committed fraud upon it and guarantees most relators a portion of the proceeds from the action or postfiling settlement, regardless of whether the government intervenes.
机译:美国相对。 Ritchie诉洛克希德·马丁公司(Ritchie v。Lockheed Martin Corp.)分析了私人当事方之间的释放协议的可执行性,在该协议中,释放方随后提交了涉嫌与美国有关的“虚假索赔法”(FCA)诉讼。 FCA的“ quitam”部分允许私人作为政府代表对那些对其实施欺诈的人提起诉讼,并保证大多数代表从诉讼或提交后和解中获得的收益的一部分,无论政府是否干预。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号