首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies >PATTERNS OF USE OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING E-TECHNICAL REPORTS BY THE INDIAN AEROSPACE SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS IN BANGALORE: A RESEARCH SURVEY
【24h】

PATTERNS OF USE OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING E-TECHNICAL REPORTS BY THE INDIAN AEROSPACE SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS IN BANGALORE: A RESEARCH SURVEY

机译:印度班加罗尔航空航天工程学家和工程师使用航空航天工程电子技术报告的方式:一项研究调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A large number of aerospace e-technical reports are frequently referred by the aerospace scientists and engineers for their day to day research work. A survey study was undertaken to ascertain the most frequently used aerospace e-technical reports amongst 16 selected aero- space organizations of Bangalore. The study is restricted to geographic boundary of the city of Bangalore. Out of the 650 survey questionnaires distributed to the scientists and engineers, a total number of 612 were received back and finally 583 responses found suitable were selected for the study. The total responses usable from all the 16 aerospace organizations amounted to 89.7 percent. The analysis is based purely on the responses received from the aerospace scientists and engineers representing these selected aerospace organizations. The responses from the participants towards the extent of use of the e-technical reports were graded on a scale of 4 to 0, 4 representing to a great extent. The major findings that the authors would like to report in this paper are: The most frequently referred aerospace engineering e-technical reports by these scientists and engineers are: (a) 'USA, NASA', followed by, (b) 'USA, AIAA', (c) 'Indian NAL', (d) 'AGARD', (e) 'British ARC and RAE', (f) 'ESA', (g) 'French ONERA', (h) 'German DFVLR, DLR and MBB', (i) 'Dutch NLR', (j) 'Russian TaAGI', and, finally, (k) 'Japanese NAL'. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied for testing the significant difference among the mean scores attained from 16 aerospace organizations towards the 'Use of e-Technical Reports'. It is observed that all the 16 aerospace organizations show a significant difference (P < 0.05) in their mean scores viz., 'AGARD', 'British ARC and RAE', 'ESA', Indian NAL', 'German DFVLR', DLR and MBB', 'Japanese NAL', 'Russian TaAGI', 'Dutch NLR', 'USA, NASA' and 'USA, AIAA', except for 'French ONERA' (P = 0.092).
机译:航空航天科学家和工程师经常将大量的航空航天电子技术报告用于日常研究工作。进行了一项调查研究,以确定在班加罗尔的16个选定的航空航天组织中最常用的航空航天电子技术报告。该研究仅限于班加罗尔市的地理边界。在分发给科学家和工程师的650份调查问卷中,总共收到612份,最后选择了583份适合本研究的答复。 16个航空航天组织的可用总答复率为89.7%。该分析纯粹基于代表这些选定航空组织的航空科学家和工程师的反馈。参与者对使用电子技术报告的程度的回应等级为4到0,其中4代表了很大程度。作者希望在本文中报告的主要发现是:这些科学家和工程师最常提及的航空工程电子技术报告是:(a)'美国,NASA',其次是(b)'美国, AIAA”,(c)“印度NAL”,(d)“ AGARD”,(e)“英国ARC和RAE”,(f)“ ESA”,(g)“法国ONERA”,(h)“德国DFVLR”, DLR和MBB”,(i)“荷兰NLR”,(j)“俄罗斯TaAGI”,最后是(k)“日本NAL”。方差分析(ANOVA)用于测试16个航空航天组织在“电子技术报告的使用”方面获得的平均得分之间的显着差异。据观察,所有16个航空航天组织的平均得分均显示出显着差异(P <0.05),即“ AGARD”,“英国ARC和RAE”,“ ESA”,印度NAL,“德国DFVLR”,DLR MBB”,“日本NAL”,“俄罗斯TaAGI”,“荷兰NLR”,“美国,美国国家航空航天局”和“美国,美国航空航天局”,但“法国ONERA”除外(P = 0.092)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号