首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Academic Misconduct among Business Students: A Comparison of the US and UAE
【24h】

Academic Misconduct among Business Students: A Comparison of the US and UAE

机译:商科学生的学术不端行为:美国和阿联酋的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A survey of 345 undergraduate business students from a medium-sized southeastern regional university and 164 undergraduates from a medium-sized university in the United Arab Emirates found that 71 % of all respondents admitted to academic misconduct in a recent 1-year period, a percentage similar to McCabe's (2005) finding that an average of 70 % of undergraduate students admitted to recent academic misconduct. Business students from the Middle East were significantly less likely to perceive various academic misconduct behaviors as forms of serious cheating compared to business students from the US. Hofstede's (2001) cultural dimension of individualism/collectivism and Ajzen's (Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179-211, 1991) theory of planned behavior are discussed as likely explanations of reported academic misconduct differences between the two countries.
机译:对东南部中型地区大学的345名本科商科学生和阿拉伯联合酋长国的中型大学的164名本科生进行的一项调查发现,在最近1年的时间里,所有被访者中有71%承认学术不端行为,这一百分比与McCabe(2005)的发现相似,平均70%的本科生承认近期的学术不端行为。与来自美国的商科学生相比,来自中东的商科学生不太可能将各种学术不端行为视为严重的作弊形式。 Hofstede(2001)的个人主义/集体主义的文化维度和Ajzen(组织行为与人类决策过程50,179-211,1991)的计划行为理论被讨论为对两国之间学术不端行为差异的报道的可能解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号