首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Ethical Beliefs Toward Academic Dishonesty: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Undergraduate Students in Ukraine and the United States
【24h】

Ethical Beliefs Toward Academic Dishonesty: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Undergraduate Students in Ukraine and the United States

机译:走向学术不诚实的伦理信仰:乌克兰和美国本科生的跨文化比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Little work has been done on beliefs toward academic misconduct in Ukraine. This study explored the beliefs of Ukrainian students toward various forms of academic misconduct and compared the results to the U.S. undergraduate students (N=270). Twenty-two forms of cheating, plagiarism, and questionable academic behaviors were grouped in five categories: unilateral cheating, collective cheating, falsification gaining favoritism, and performing extra work to receive better grades. Cross-cultural comparisons of beliefs were pivotal in this study. Results indicated that, in general, Ukrainian students are less likely to believe that academic misconduct is wrong compared to their U.S. counterparts, as well as seem to have different beliefs on what is and isn't academic misconduct. Recommendations are proposed to help students change their beliefs and to reduce academic dishonesty. These recommendations also have application purposes outside of Ukraine.
机译:乌克兰对学术不端行为的信念还没有做过任何工作。这项研究探讨了乌克兰学生对各种形式的学术不端行为的信念,并将结果与​​美国大学生(N = 270)进行了比较。 22种作弊,窃和可疑的学术行为形式分为五类:单方面作弊,集体作弊,伪造获得偏爱以及进行额外的工作以获得更好的成绩。信念的跨文化比较在这项研究中至关重要。结果表明,总体而言,乌克兰学生与美国学生相比不太可能认为学术不端行为是错误的,并且似乎对什么是学术性不道德行为有不同的看法。提出了一些建议,以帮助学生改变信仰并减少学术上的不诚实。这些建议在乌克兰境外也具有应用目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号