首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Students at Risk for Being Reported for Cheating
【24h】

Students at Risk for Being Reported for Cheating

机译:有被举报作弊风险的学生

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Student cheating has always been a problem in higher education, but detection of cheating has become easier with technology (Bertram Gallant 2008). As a result, more students are being caught and reported for cheating. While reporting cheating is not a negative, the rippling effects of reported cheating (e.g., reduced time to degree) may be felt by some populations (e.g., first-generation college students, international students) more than others. Thus, preventing cheating would be a preferable option for all involved. Identifying those at risk for being reported for cheating is a first step in developing preventive measures. Previous research has attempted to do this through the use of self-report surveys, but such research takes considerable time and resources to conduct and suffers from low response rates and social desirability bias. To address this limitation in existing research, this study links existing data from records of other-reported cheating to university registration data in order to examine 6 cheating risk factors identified in previous research: maturity level, gender, grade point average, major, international student status, and fear of punishment. The results of the study suggest that international and transfer students, particularly those who are male, in high-risk majors (like computer science, economics and engineering), and have lower grade point averages, are in particular need of preventative education. Likewise, those faculty who teach in computer science, engineering and economics majors should do more to educate implement practices to reduce the likelihood of cheating.
机译:学生作弊一直是高等教育中的一个问题,但是利用技术,对作弊的检测变得更加容易(Bertram Gallant 2008)。结果,更多的学生被发现并作弊。虽然报告作弊不是负面的,但某些人群(例如第一代大学生,国际学生)可能比其他人感觉到报告作弊的涟漪效应(例如,缩短学位时间)。因此,对于所有参与者而言,防止作弊将是一个更好的选择。确定有被举报作弊风险的人是制定预防措施的第一步。先前的研究试图通过使用自我报告调查来做到这一点,但是这种研究花费了大量的时间和资源来进行,并且遭受了低回应率和社会期望偏差的困扰。为了解决现有研究中的这一局限性,本研究将其他报告的作弊记录中的现有数据与大学注册数据联系起来,以检查先前研究中发现的6种作弊风险因素:成熟度,性别,平均成绩,专业,国际学生地位,害怕受到惩罚。研究结果表明,国际和转学生,特别是那些高风险专业(如计算机科学,经济学和工程学)的男生,且平均成绩较低,特别需要预防教育。同样,那些在计算机科学,工程学和经济学专业任教的教师应该做更多的事情来教育实施实践,以减少作弊的可能性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Academic Ethics》 |2015年第3期|217-228|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0069, USA;

    Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0631C, USA;

    Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0631C, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Academic cheating; Risk factors; High risk populations;

    机译:学术作弊;风险因素;高危人群;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:21:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号