首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >How Can We Do it Right? Ethical Uncertainty in Swedish Sami Research
【24h】

How Can We Do it Right? Ethical Uncertainty in Swedish Sami Research

机译:我们如何才能做到正确?瑞典萨米人研究中的伦理不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research related to indigenous peoples in Sweden and elsewhere has a history marked by discriminatory practice and unequal research processes. Sweden has still not been very visible in terms of openly debating, developing and implementing ethical strategies specifically suited for indigenous research. The present study explores how research ethics is discussed among scholars within the Sami research field in contemporary Sweden. Fifty-six research proposals deriving from eight different research institutions and 160 individual researchers are analyzed, discovering how scholars relate to research ethics when planning for new research projects related to the indigenous Sami. The results demonstrate that ethical guidelines for research are often referred to, but that a common view on what guidelines to use is lacking, leading to a notable variety between different researchers. Ethical discussions are present in the vast majority of the proposals, however there are notable differences between the theories around how to proceed in a culturally safe, ethical manner, and the proposed methods that are to be used to implement theory in practice. In conclusion, there exists a great uncertainty among scholars on where to seek ethical guidance, how to relate to current legislation around research ethics and at the same time act ethically in a culturally appropriate manner. This uncertainty leads to questioning whether discussions of ethics are relevant in the first place, what they are supposed to include, how they are meant to be undertaken and what consequences can be expected from the presence or absence of ethics in indigenous research.
机译:瑞典和其他地方与土著人民有关的研究具有歧视性实践和不平等的研究过程的历史。在公开辩论,制定和实施专门适合于土著研究的伦理战略方面,瑞典仍然不是很明显。本研究探索了如何在当代瑞典萨米人研究领域的学者之间讨论研究伦理。对来自八个不同研究机构和160位个人研究人员的56项研究建议进行了分析,发现了在计划与土著萨米人有关的新研究项目时,学者们如何与研究伦理相联系。结果表明,通常会参考研究的伦理准则,但缺乏对使用准则的共识,导致不同研究人员之间存在显着差异。绝大多数提案中都存在伦理讨论,但是,围绕如何以一种文化安全,符合道德的方式进行的理论与拟在实践中用于实施理论的方法之间存在显着差异。总而言之,学者们在哪里寻求伦理指导,如何与当前有关研究伦理的立法相联系以及如何以文化上适当的方式采取道德行动方面存在很大的不确定性。这种不确定性导致人们开始质疑伦理学的讨论是否相关,应该包含哪些内容,打算如何进行以及在本土研究中存在或不存在伦理学会带来什么后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号