首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Validating Academic Integrity Survey (AIS): An Application of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analytic Procedures
【24h】

Validating Academic Integrity Survey (AIS): An Application of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analytic Procedures

机译:验证学术诚信度调查(AIS):探索性和确认性因素分析程序的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study concerned validating academic integrity survey (AIS), a measure developed in 2010 to investigate academic integrity practices in a Malaysian university. It also examined the usefulness of the measure across gender and nationality of the participants (undergraduates of Nigerian and Malaysian public universities). The sample size comprised 450 students selected via quota sampling technique. The findings supported the multidimensionality of academic dishonesty. Also, strong evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, and construct reliability were generated for the revised AIS. The testing of moderating effects yielded two outcomes. While the gender invariant analysis produced evidence that the three-dimensional model was not moderated by gender; the nationality effect was inconclusive, probably due to a noticeable imbalance in respondent distribution for the nationality group. The significance of this study lies not only in the rigorous statistical methods deployed to validate the dimension and psychometric properties of the AIS; but establishing the gender invariance of the model. It is understood from the findings that although male and female students may vary in their academic misconducts, the underlying factors for these conducts are the same and can be addressed effectively using a non-discriminating approach.
机译:这项研究涉及验证学术诚信度调查(AIS),这是一项于2010年开发的旨在调查马来西亚大学学术诚信行为的措施。它还检查了该措施对参与者(尼日利亚和马来西亚公立大学的本科生)的性别和国籍的有用性。样本数量包括450名通过配额采样技术选择的学生。这些发现支持了学术不诚实的多维性。同样,对于修订后的AIS产生了收敛和判别有效性以及构造可靠性的有力证据。缓和作用的测试产生了两个结果。尽管性别不变分析产生了证据,表明三维模型并未受到性别的调节;国籍的影响尚无定论,这可能是由于国籍人群在受访者分布上的明显失衡所致。这项研究的意义不仅在于采用严格的统计方法来验证AIS的维度和心理计量特性,还在于但要建立模型的性别不变性。从调查结果中可以了解到,尽管男女学生的学术行为可能有所不同,但这些行为的潜在因素是相同的,可以使用非歧视性方法予以有效解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号