【24h】

Confucian Humanism and Theodicy

机译:儒家人本主义与神学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article explores the puzzle of Confucian “divine humanism” in light of the Weberian scheme of religious rationalization. Relating the Confucian humanistic orientation to current discussions of the phenomenon of “amoral familism,” I argue that the Confucian puzzle calls into question the cornerstone of Max Weber's comparative religion, namely his influential contrast between religious legitimation and theodicy. In particular, the puzzle suggests that in pre-Confucian China, there was no legitimate cosmic-social world order to which Confucianism managed to adjust, let alone to affirm. As a matter of fact, it was the Confucian solution to the problem of theodicy that laid the foundation for the legitimacy of the ethical polity. Hence, inverting what Weber and neo-Weberian theorists have asserted about the religious breakthroughs in the Axial Age, theodicy constituted the religious prerequisite for political legitimation.
机译:本文根据韦伯式的宗教合理化方案,探讨了儒家“神性人本主义”的困惑。我把儒家的人本主义取向与当前对“不道德家庭主义”现象的讨论联系起来,我认为儒家难题使马克斯·韦伯比较宗教的基石受到质疑,即他在宗教合法性和神学研究之间的影响力对比。特别是,这个谜题表明,在儒家以前的中国,没有儒家设法适应的合法的宇宙社会世界秩序,更不用说肯定了。事实上,正是儒家对神学问题的解决为道德政体的合法性奠定了基础。因此,颠倒了韦伯和新韦伯理论家关于轴心时代宗教突破的断言,神狄奥西奇理论构成了政治合法性的宗教前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号