首页> 外文期刊>Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies >POSTCOLONIALITY AND THE NATIONAL QUESTION IN MARXIST HISTORIOGRAPHY
【24h】

POSTCOLONIALITY AND THE NATIONAL QUESTION IN MARXIST HISTORIOGRAPHY

机译:后殖民主义与马克思主义史学中的民族问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In examining the relation between Marxist historiography and the theoretical trajectories of postcolonial studies, the problem posed in Marxist theory under the name of ‘the national question’ remains decisive. This question is always emerging around the tensions generated between the logic of capital, the purified circuit-process of capital's self-unfolding, and the local conditions of its deployment, typically the modern form of the nation-state. I argue that the history of the prewar debate on the nature of Japanese capitalism, which was itself the fundamental locus for the development of Marxist historiography and theory in Japan, can be a suggestive source of clues for the explication of this relation. In examining the theoretical problems that inhere in this historical moment, I attempt to argue that the national question in Marxist theory can be forcefully renewed through a parallax movement with the question of the postcolonial, that is, the irreversibility of the history of colonialism inscribed in the form of the nation-state. In other words, the national question is not only a question of the levels and stages of capitalist development in given, apparently stable areas; it is also the question of how the logic of capital relates to the historico-epistemological production of ‘the national’ itself. View full textDownload full textKeywordscapitalist development, Japanese Marxism, Marxist historiography, nation-state, postcolonial studiesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2011.545583
机译:在考察马克思主义史学与后殖民研究的理论轨迹之间的关系时,马克思主义理论中以“国家问题”为名的问题仍然是决定性的。这个问题总是围绕着资本逻辑,资本自我展开的纯净电路过程以及其部署的当地条件(通常是民族国家的现代形式)之间产生的张力而出现。我认为,战前关于日本资本主义性质的辩论的历史本身就是日本马克思主义史学和理论发展的基本轨迹,它可以为说明这种关系提供线索。在考察这一历史时刻存在的理论问题时,我试图指出,马克思主义理论中的民族问题可以通过视差运动与后殖民主义的问题有力地加以更新,即,殖民主义历史的不可逆转。民族国家的形式。换句话说,民族问题不仅是在给定的,显然稳定的地区中资本主义发展水平和阶段的问题;这也是资本逻辑如何与“国民”本身的历史主义-认识论生产联系起来的问题。查看全文下载全文关键词资本主义的发展,日本马克思主义,马克思主义的历史学,民族国家,后殖民研究,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2011.545583

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号